13-32363263-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.8061T>C(p.Val2687Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000248 in 1,614,030 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.8061T>C | p.Val2687Val | synonymous_variant | Exon 18 of 27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.7692T>C | p.Val2564Val | synonymous_variant | Exon 18 of 27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*119T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 17 of 26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 | ||||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259 | n.*119T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 17 of 25 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251256Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135792
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000267 AC: 39AN: 1461820Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000138 AC XY: 10AN XY: 727204
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74378
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:2
- -
Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
- -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Benign:1
- -
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
The BRCA2 p.Val2687= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the LOVD 3.0, BIC Database, ARUP Laboratories, or Zhejiang Colon Cancer Databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs776992904) as With Likely benign allele, ClinVar (classified as likely benign by ENIGMA, Ambry Genetics, Invitae), Clinvitae (classified as likely benign ClinVar), the COGR (conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity), and UMD-LSDB (2X unclassified variant). The variant was identified in control databases in 1 of 246044 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000004 (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Val2687= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at