Menu
GeneBe

13-32363351-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 2P and 12B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.8149G>T(p.Ala2717Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00139 in 1,614,110 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A2717V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

4
12

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:38O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.39
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 6 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 2 benign, 15 uncertain in NM_000059.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.020698756).
BP6
Variant 13-32363351-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32363351-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41564.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32363351-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32363351-G-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.8149G>T p.Ala2717Ser missense_variant 18/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.8149G>T p.Ala2717Ser missense_variant 18/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00128
AC:
195
AN:
152130
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000531
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00236
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000566
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00109
AC:
275
AN:
251278
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00114
AC XY:
155
AN XY:
135824
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000369
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000896
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000993
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00102
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00177
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00228
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00140
AC:
2053
AN:
1461862
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00134
AC XY:
977
AN XY:
727226
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000329
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000917
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00169
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00108
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00128
AC:
195
AN:
152248
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00109
AC XY:
81
AN XY:
74450
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000530
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00235
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000566
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.00141
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00137
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00162
AC:
6
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00156
AC:
6
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00221
AC:
19
ExAC
AF:
0.00116
AC:
141
EpiCase
AF:
0.00158
EpiControl
AF:
0.00124

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:38Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:14
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)May 01, 2012- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBRCAlab, Lund UniversityMar 02, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtAug 24, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGenApr 23, 2024The c.8149G>T variant in BRCA2 is a missense variant predicted to cause substitution of Alanine by Serine at amino acid 2717 (p.Ala2717Ser). The highest non-cancer, non-founder population filter allele frequency in gnomAD v2.1 (exomes only, non-cancer subset, read depth >=20) or gnomAD v3.1 (non-cancer subset, read depth >=20) is 0.001751 in the Latino/Admixed American population, which is above the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP threshold (>0.001) for BA1 (BA1 met). This BRCA2 missense variant is within a key functional domain and the computational predictor BayesDel (noAF) gives a score of -0.0816, which is below the recommended threshold of 0.18 for predicting no impact on BRCA2 via protein change. SpliceAI predictor score of 0.03 suggests that the variant has no impact on splicing (score threshold <0.10) (BP4 met). Reported by 3 calibrated studies to exhibit protein function similar to benign control variants (PMIDs: 29988080, 33609447, 32444794) (BS3 met). This variant has been observed in 2 individuals with features considered inconsistent with an FA-associated phenotype, and (Likely) Pathogenic variant seen in trans or variant is homozygous (total score 4 points) (BS2 met; Invitae internal contributor). Multifactorial likelihood ratio analysis using clinically calibrated data produced a combined LR for this variant of 2.288E-117 (based on Cosegregation LR=4.52E-08; Pathology LR=5.249E-08; Family History LR=1.995E-19; Case-Control LR=4.83E-84), below the threshold for Very strong benign evidence (LR <0.00285) (BP5_Very strong met; PMID: Internal lab contributors). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as a Benign variant for BRCA2-related cancer predisposition based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP (BA1, BP4, BS3, BS2, BP5_Very strong). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganNov 03, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPathway GenomicsNov 06, 2014- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsSep 16, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylMar 05, 2014- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:6Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Clinvar: 10 labs classify as LB/Ben; ExAC: 0.2% (118/66734) European chromosomes -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 26, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoSep 22, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 15, 2014- -
not provided Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicOct 07, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 18, 2023- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJan 01, 2024BRCA2: BP1, BS3:Supporting, BS1 -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsJan 05, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthFeb 11, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingVantari GeneticsDec 18, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Sep 08, 2020- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 03, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingFoulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical ResearchFeb 15, 2001- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioApr 17, 2023- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesNov 16, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Ala2717Ser variant has been identified in five individuals from our laboratory, 36 times in the UMD-BRCA2 database and 112 times in the BIC database. The variant was identified in 19 of 7810 proband chromosomes in individuals with breast, ovarian and prostate cancer patients (Edwards 2003, Diez 2003, Lubinski 2004, Salazar 2006, Giannini 2006, Soegaard 2008, Caux-Moncoutier 2009, Capanu 2011). However, an inadequate number of control chromosomes were tested to establish the variants frequency in the general population. This variant is listed in dbSNP database as coming from a "clinical source" (ID#: rs28897747) and was identified in more than one population with an average heterozygosity of 0.004+/-0.046, increasing the likelihood that this is a low frequency benign variant. The Ala2717 residue is not highly conserved in mammals and neither computational analyses (SIFT, AlignGVGD) nor other in silico protein modeling predictions (Karchin 2008, Spurdle 2008) suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. Finally, this variant was identified in at least three individuals in the UMD database who had a second premature truncating variant that is expected to be pathogenic, increasing the likelihood that the p.Ala2712Ser variant is not clinically significant. In summary, based on the above information this variant is classified as Benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.088
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.21
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.080
Cadd
Benign
10
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Benign
0.053
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.056
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.90
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.029
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.021
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.31
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.96
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.44
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.54
Sift
Benign
0.12
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.14
T;T
Vest4
0.38
MVP
0.86
MPC
0.022
ClinPred
0.042
T
GERP RS
4.5
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
gMVP
0.34

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28897747; hg19: chr13-32937488; COSMIC: COSV66460731; COSMIC: COSV66460731; API