13-32370456-C-T

Position:

chr13-32370456-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.8386C>T(p.Pro2796Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000192 in 1,461,682 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000019 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.616

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.15300861).

BP6

Variant 13-32370456-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32370456-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 91511.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=4}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.8386C>T	p.Pro2796Ser	missense_variant	19/27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.8386C>T	p.Pro2796Ser	missense_variant	19/27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497	A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

Cov.:

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000159

AC:

AN:

251442

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000221

AC XY:

AN XY:

135892

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000352

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000192

AC:

AN:

1461682

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000179

AC XY:

AN XY:

727148

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000119

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000216

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

Cov.:

Alfa

AF:

0.0000301

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000151

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000519

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000165

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	Jul 06, 2023	In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 30254663 (2018), 34011307 (2021)) and reported to have no deleterious effect on BRCA2 mRNA splicing (PMID: 22505045 (2012)). In a large-scale breast cancer association study, the variant was observed in an individual with breast cancer as well as in unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/BRCA2)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000035 (4/113728 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Jul 06, 2017	Variant summary: The c.8386C>T (p.Pro2796Ser) in BRCA2 gene is a missense variant involves a non-conserved nucleotide and 3/5 in silico tools predict benign outcome. The variant is located within the close proximity to the second OB fold (OB2) of the 800-amino acid C-terminal ssDNA binding domain (DBD) of BRCA2, however no functional studies confirming an effect of this change on the protein function were published at the time of evaluation. The variant was proven to not affect splicing. The variant is present at a low frequencies in the control population datasets of ExAC and gnomAD (1.647e-05; 2/121408 and 4/246222 chrs tested, respectively). These frequencies do not exceed the maximal expected allele frequency for a disease causing allele in BRCA2 gene (0.000175). The variant has been reported in several affected individuals via published reports without strong evidence for causality. Lastly, several reputable databases/clinical laboratories have classified the variant as VUS/Likely Benign. Taken together, the variant was classified as VUS, until new information becomes available. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Dec 26, 2018	This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25428789, 24094589, 22505045, 30254663, 30263092) -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research	-	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario	Jun 09, 2017	- -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)	Apr 19, 2011	- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna	Sep 01, 2023	BP5(Moderate) according to ACMG/AMP classification guidelines specified for BRCA1 & BRCA2 (Classification Criteria V1.0.0 2023-09-08 - https://cspec.genome.network/cspec/ui/svi/affiliation/50087) (PMID: 38160042) -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 27, 2024	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.	Nov 21, 2023	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Apr 26, 2016	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Mar 26, 2019	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.085

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.050

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.20

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

Eigen

Benign

-0.79

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.74

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.13

M_CAP

Benign

0.052

MetaRNN

Benign

0.15

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.95

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.25

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.6

N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.33

Sift

Benign

0.20

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.17

T;T

Vest4

0.35

MVP

0.80

MPC

0.030

ClinPred

0.050

GERP RS

2.0

gMVP

0.38

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.16

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over