13-32370604-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.8487+47C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00265 in 1,574,010 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 82 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 38 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 44 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 intron
NM_000059.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.397
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 13-32370604-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32370604-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 126179.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32370604-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32370604-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0137 (2083/152190) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0475 (1971/41502). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0457. There are 38 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 966 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 38 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.8487+47C>T | intron_variant | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.8487+47C>T | intron_variant | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0137 AC: 2082AN: 152072Hom.: 38 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2082
AN:
152072
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00355 AC: 852AN: 240012Hom.: 17 AF XY: 0.00259 AC XY: 336AN XY: 129888
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
852
AN:
240012
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
336
AN XY:
129888
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00147 AC: 2094AN: 1421820Hom.: 44 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.00128 AC XY: 905AN XY: 709134
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2094
AN:
1421820
Hom.:
Cov.:
26
AF XY:
AC XY:
905
AN XY:
709134
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0137 AC: 2083AN: 152190Hom.: 38 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0130 AC XY: 966AN XY: 74404
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2083
AN:
152190
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
966
AN XY:
74404
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jan 12, 2015 | Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.05488 (African), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Oct 09, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan | Nov 03, 2014 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | Nov 30, 1998 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA2 c.8487+47C>T variant was identified in the literature. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs11571744) “With Uncertain significance allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.0162 (1000 Genomes Project), NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server), Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database, Clinvitae database (X1), LOVD, the ClinVar database, GeneInsight COGR database (1X), the BIC database (2X with no clinical importance), and UMD (37X as a neutral variant). In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants (BRCA1 (c.1813dup (p.Ile605AsnfsX11); c.5576_5579delTTAA (p.Ile1859LysfsX3); c.1310_1313delAAGA (p.Lys437IlefsX22); BRCA2 (c.IVS16+6T>C (c.4986+6T>C); c.1488delT (p.Leu498SerfsX5)), increasing the likelihood that the c.8487+47C>T variant does not have clinical significance. In BIC database variant was reported to occur in outbred control reference groups at an allele frequency >1% (MAF>0.01), and classifies the variant as not pathogenic/low clinical significance. This variant was identified in the 1000 Genomes Project in 81 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0162), Exome Variant Server project in 1 of 8600 European American and in 197 of 4404 African American alleles, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The variant was also found in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Jan 13, 2015) in 436 of 9658 chromosomes (frequency: 0.045) and nine times in homozygous state from a population of African individuals, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The variant was also identified in 39 of 91040 European (Non-Finnish)/ Latino / South Asian/European (Finnish) individuals, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In addition, global sequence diversity analysis identified the variant has global heterozygosity 0.018 and classified the variant as polymorphism (Wagner 1999). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at