Menu
GeneBe

13-32379455-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4BP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):ā€‹c.8893G>Cā€‹(p.Asp2965His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000657 in 152,136 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D2965G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

9
7

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.73
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.36571088).
BP6
Variant 13-32379455-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32379455-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 52696.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=2}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.8893G>C p.Asp2965His missense_variant 22/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.8893G>C p.Asp2965His missense_variant 22/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152136
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
31
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152136
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74320
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.00000378

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthAug 08, 2023This missense variant replaces aspartic acid with histidine at codon 2965 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have reported that this variant has no impact on BRCA2 function in a homology-directed repair assay (PMID: 23108138, 29394989, 35736817). Multifactorial analysis has reported co-segregation, co-occurrence and family history likelihood ratios for pathogenicity of 1.00, 1.08 and 1.07, respectively (PMID: 23108138, 31131967). This variant also has been detected in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 1/60463 cases and 1/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_000381). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylDec 27, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJun 28, 2023This missense variant replaces aspartic acid with histidine at codon 2965 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have reported that this variant has no impact on BRCA2 function in a homology-directed repair assay (PMID: 23108138, 29394989, 35736817). Multifactorial analysis has reported co-segregation, co-occurrence and family history likelihood ratios for pathogenicity of 1.00, 1.08 and 1.07, respectively (PMID: 23108138, 31131967). This variant also has been detected in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 1/60463 cases and 1/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_000381). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 26, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 16, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 02, 2020Variant summary: BRCA2 c.8893G>C (p.Asp2965His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 249982 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. Studies utilizing multifactorial likelihood models to assess the clinical significance of BRCA1/BRCA2 variants predict this variant to be likely non-pathogenic (e.g. Guidugli_2013, Lindor_2012). Experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function through utilization of a homologous recombination DNA-repair activity assay demonstrated the variant to be neutral/non-pathogenic (e.g. Guidugli_2013, 2018). Four ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as likely benign (n=3) and as uncertain significance (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJun 23, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.26
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.16
D
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.010
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Benign
0.96
Eigen
Uncertain
0.26
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.17
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.95
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.21
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.37
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.15
D
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.40
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.8
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.44
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0030
D;D
Vest4
0.44
MutPred
0.35
Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0499);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0499);
MVP
0.86
MPC
0.17
ClinPred
0.96
D
GERP RS
4.8
gMVP
0.50

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80359141; hg19: chr13-32953592; API