13-32380123-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4BP5BP7_Strong
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.9234C>T variant in BRCA2 is a synonymous variant (p.Val3078=). This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (exomes only, non-cancer subset) or gnomAD v3.1 (non-cancer subset) but is below the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP threshold >0.00002 for BS1_Supporting (PM2_Supporting, BS1, and BA1 are not met). This BRCA2 synonymous (silent) variant is within a key functional domain, and SpliceAI predictor score of 0.00 suggests that the variant has no impact on splicing (score threshold <0.10) (BP4 met). This is a synonymous (silent) variant, and mRNA experimental analysis indicates small or no impact on splicing (PMIDs: 31143303, 20215541 and pers comm E Velasco, Ambry internal contributor), considered strong evidence against pathogenicity (BP7_Strong (RNA)). Multifactorial likelihood ratio analysis using clinically calibrated data produced a combined LR for this variant of 0.055 (based on Family History LR=0.055), within the thresholds for Moderate benign evidence (LR ≥0.05 & <0.23) (BP5_Moderate met; PMID:31853058). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as a Benign variant for BRCA2-related cancer predisposition based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP (BP4, BP7_Strong (RNA), BP5_Moderate). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA026042/MONDO:0012933/097
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.9234C>T | p.Val3078Val | synonymous_variant | Exon 24 of 27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.8865C>T | p.Val2955Val | synonymous_variant | Exon 24 of 27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*1292C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 23 of 26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 | ||||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259 | n.*1292C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 23 of 25 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152100Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 250876Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135590
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000212 AC: 31AN: 1461328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000206 AC XY: 15AN XY: 726918
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152100Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74302
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
- -
- -
- -
BRCA2: BP4, BP7 -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
- -
not specified Benign:2
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
- -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
BRCA2-related cancer predisposition Benign:1
The c.9234C>T variant in BRCA2 is a synonymous variant (p.Val3078=). This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (exomes only, non-cancer subset) or gnomAD v3.1 (non-cancer subset) but is below the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP threshold >0.00002 for BS1_Supporting (PM2_Supporting, BS1, and BA1 are not met). This BRCA2 synonymous (silent) variant is within a key functional domain, and SpliceAI predictor score of 0.00 suggests that the variant has no impact on splicing (score threshold <0.10) (BP4 met). This is a synonymous (silent) variant, and mRNA experimental analysis indicates small or no impact on splicing (PMIDs: 31143303, 20215541 and pers comm E Velasco, Ambry internal contributor), considered strong evidence against pathogenicity (BP7_Strong (RNA)). Multifactorial likelihood ratio analysis using clinically calibrated data produced a combined LR for this variant of 0.055 (based on Family History LR=0.055), within the thresholds for Moderate benign evidence (LR >=0.05 & <0.23) (BP5_Moderate met; PMID: 31853058). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as a Benign variant for BRCA2-related cancer predisposition based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP (BP4, BP7_Strong (RNA), BP5_Moderate). -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
The BRCA2 p.Val3078= variant was identified in 2 of 2180 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0009) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer (Sanz 2010, Schenkel 2016). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs587782428) as “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (8x as benign, likely benign and uncertain significance by ENIGMA, Color, Integrated Genetics, GeneDx, Counsyl, Quest, Ambry Genetic, Invitae) and LOVD 3.0 (2x as VUS and likely benign).The variant was not identified in UMD-LSDB. The variant was also identified by our laboratory in 1 individual with BRCA. The variant was identified in control databases in 3 of 276678 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00001 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Latino in 1 of 34360 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), European Non-Finnish in 2 of 126488 chromosomes (freq: 0.000016), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish or South Asian populations. The p.Val3078= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. However, in a study by (Sanz 2010), bioinformatics programs predicted the disruption of an exonic splicing enhancer and the creation of exonic splicing silencers; in addition, mRNA analysis of the variant in this study showed partial exon 24 skipping, with a predicted partial truncation of protein product. In this same study the variant was identified in a patient with a co-occurring BRCA1 c.4165_4166delAG pathogenic variant providing conflicting evidence. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at