13-32394673-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.9257-16T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00788 in 1,609,366 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 72 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0060 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0081 ( 69 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 intron
NM_000059.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.00
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 13-32394673-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32394673-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 52790.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32394673-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32394673-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00601 (915/152358) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0085 (578/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00792. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 437 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.9257-16T>C | intron_variant | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.9257-16T>C | intron_variant | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.8888-16T>C | intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*1315-16T>C | intron_variant | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00602 AC: 916AN: 152240Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
916
AN:
152240
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00659 AC: 1610AN: 244488Hom.: 15 AF XY: 0.00687 AC XY: 910AN XY: 132364
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1610
AN:
244488
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
910
AN XY:
132364
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00807 AC: 11761AN: 1457008Hom.: 69 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00823 AC XY: 5961AN XY: 724638
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
11761
AN:
1457008
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
5961
AN XY:
724638
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00601 AC: 915AN: 152358Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00587 AC XY: 437AN XY: 74506
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
915
AN:
152358
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
437
AN XY:
74506
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:25
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:9
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Apr 10, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Oct 09, 2014 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jan 12, 2015 | Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.01055 (European), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Feb 22, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan | Nov 03, 2014 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Mar 15, 2011 | - - |
not specified Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA2 c.9257-16T>C variant was identified in 121 of 53524 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals or families with Breast and Ovarian cancer, and was present in 4 of 530 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.08) from healthy individuals (Caputo 2011, Borg 2010, Hadijisavvas 2003, Cvok 2008, Diez 2003). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs11571818) with “other” allele, with a minor allele frequency of 0.0044(1000 Genomes Project); in NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server) in 67 of 8600 European and 10 of 4406 African Americans; in Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database in 574(3 homozygote) of 56204 of Europeans(non-Finnish), in 15 of 9522 Africans, in 25 of 10298 Latinos, in 116 (4 homozygote) of 15288 South Asians , in 77 (2 homozygote) of 6222 Europeans (Finnish) and 5 of 820 other populations, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The variant was also found in LOVD, the ClinVar database (classified as a benign variant by the Sharing Clinical Reports Project, derived from Myriad reports, classified as benign by Invitae, as benign by Counsyl, as benign by GeneDX, as benign by Emory Genetics, as Likely benign by CHEO and as uncertain significance by BIC). It was also identified in GeneInsight through the Canadian Open Genetics Repository (http://opengenetics.ca/) (1X, classified as “likely benign” by a clinical laboratory), the BIC database (12X with no clinical importance), and UMD (73X as a neutral variant). In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants (BRCA1:c.5116G>A (p.Gly1706Arg), c.4391delC (p.Pro1464LeufsX2), c.81_134delp.Cys27X); BRCA2:c.6275_6276delTT (p.Leu2092ProfsX7), c.4889C>G (p.Ser1630X), increasing the likelihood that the c.9257-16T>C variant does not have clinical significance. The c.9257-16T>C variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In addition splicing studies (Bonnet 2008, Claes 2003) showed that the c.9257-16T>C do not result in aberrant splicing. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency | Apr 18, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 13, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 03, 2014 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 22, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 09, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 15, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Apr 28, 2021 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Feb 23, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at