13-32394707-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 3P and 1B. PM1PP3BP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.9275A>G​(p.Tyr3092Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000657 in 1,613,290 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Y3092F) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000067 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

7
7
1

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.06

Publications

32 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • medulloblastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 7 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 16 benign, 22 uncertain in NM_000059.4
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.838
BP6
Variant 13-32394707-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32394707-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 52800.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000059.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
BRCA2
NM_000059.4
MANE Select
c.9275A>Gp.Tyr3092Cys
missense
Exon 25 of 27NP_000050.3
BRCA2
NM_001432077.1
c.9275A>Gp.Tyr3092Cys
missense
Exon 25 of 27NP_001419006.1
BRCA2
NM_001406720.1
c.9224A>Gp.Tyr3075Cys
missense
Exon 25 of 27NP_001393649.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
BRCA2
ENST00000380152.8
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.9275A>Gp.Tyr3092Cys
missense
Exon 25 of 27ENSP00000369497.3
BRCA2
ENST00000544455.6
TSL:1
c.9275A>Gp.Tyr3092Cys
missense
Exon 25 of 27ENSP00000439902.1
BRCA2
ENST00000530893.7
TSL:1
c.8906A>Gp.Tyr2969Cys
missense
Exon 25 of 27ENSP00000499438.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152040
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000242
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000758
AC:
19
AN:
250616
AF XY:
0.0000812
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000618
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000671
AC:
98
AN:
1461250
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000729
AC XY:
53
AN XY:
726902
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000598
AC:
2
AN:
33470
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000157
AC:
7
AN:
44692
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26116
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39684
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000128
AC:
11
AN:
86196
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53386
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000174
AC:
1
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000621
AC:
69
AN:
1111582
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000116
AC:
7
AN:
60364
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.442
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
13
19
26
32
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152040
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000539
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74262
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000242
AC:
1
AN:
41374
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15272
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5192
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000208
AC:
1
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10588
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000588
AC:
4
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2092
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
2
3
4
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000477
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000529
ExAC
AF:
0.0000659
AC:
8
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:3Benign:3
Jan 15, 2015
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com.

Feb 20, 2004
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 18, 2016
Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical Center
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:reference population

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 14, 2012
Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:3
May 10, 2019
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 02, 2024
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.9275A>G (p.Tyr3092Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the BRCA2, oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding, domain 3 (IPR015188) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 7.6e-05 in 250616 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (7.6e-05 vs 0.00075). c.9275A>G has been reported in the presumed heterozygous state in the literature in individuals suspected of or affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome, without strong evidence for causality (e.g. Lee_2008, Caux-Moncoutier_2009, Juwle_2012, Peixoto_2014, Kowalik_2018, Santonocito_2020, Park_2021). Therefore, these reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. A co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported in the UMD database (BRCA2 c.6275_6276delTT, p.Leu2092ProfsX7), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Several publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. These studies found that the variant has no impact on splicing and has normal HDR activity (e.g. Caux-Moncoutier_2009, Houdayer_2012, Guidugli_2012). HDR assays qualify as a recognized gold standard on the basis of updated guidance provided by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) working group. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 19471317, 21120943, 17924331, 23108138, 22505045, 22752604, 19043619, 30040829, 18284688, 21990134, 10717622, 25348012, 34063308, 24916970, 12427538, 32438681). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 52800). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.

not provided Benign:3
Mar 31, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

 The BRCA2 p.Tyr3092Cys variant was identified in 3 of 7064 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0004) from Portugese, French and American individuals or families with (hereditary) breast and ovarian cancer (Peixoto 2015, Lee 2008 , Malone 2000, Caux-Moncoutier 2011). Functional assays looking at allelic imbalance, homologous directed DNA repair (HDR) and splicing of the variant did not show any defects and the variant was classified as likely not pathogenic (Caux-Moncoutier 2009, Guidugli 2013, Houdayer 2012). In silico models (protein likelihood ratio and multifactorial probability) also classify the variant as neutral/likely benign (Karchin 2008, Lindor 2012, Easton 2007). The variant is reported in ClinVar (Conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity. Benign by Mendelics in 2019. Likely benign by Counsyl in 2015, Integrated Genetics in 2017, GeneDx in 2017, Invitae in 2019, ARUP Laboratories in 2019, Quest Diagnostics in 2019, Ambry in 2018, Color in 2016, SCRP in 2012, Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI in 2010. Uncertain significance by BIC in 2004, Erasmus Medical Unit in 2015, PLM at Sinai Health System in 2015, Genome Diagnostics Laboratory at Utrecht Universitiy Medical Cenre in 2014, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital in 2016), LOVD 2.0 (20 entries, 16x VUS, 1x LB, 1x B), ARUP laboratories (2 - Likely not pathogenic or of little clinical significance) databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs80359195) as Uncertain significance. The variant was identified by our laboratory in 1 individual with breast cancer. The variant was identified in control databases in 20 of 281996 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00007092 (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: South Asian in 5 of 30528 chromosomes (freq: 0.000164), Latino in 5 of 35332 chromosomes (freq: 0.000142), Other in 1 of 7194 chromosomes (freq: 0.000139), European (non-Finnish) in 8 of 128648 chromosomes (freq: 0.000062), East Asian in 1 of 19938 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005), but was not observed in the African, Ashkenazi Jewish, or European (Finnish) populations. UMD reports the variant to co-occur with a pathogenic BRCA2 variant, c.6275_6276delTT (p.Leu2092ProfsX7) (from Integrated Genetics ClinVar blurb, SCV000695231.1). The p.Tyr3092 residue is conserved in mammals and more distantly related organisms, and 8 out of 8 computational predictors (MUT Assesor, SIFT, Polyphen2, MT, FATHMM, DANN, MetaLR, Revel) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 3 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined at this time, though we would lean toward a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign.

Apr 29, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31131967, 32438681, 17924331, 21990134, 19043619, 22505045, 25782689, 10717622, 23108138, 19471317, 21120943, 24916970, 29394989, 18284688, 30040829, 25348012, 12427538, 29625052, 29884841, 32806537)

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Nov 05, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Sep 16, 2016
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 19, 2022
National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Apr 21, 2010
Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Apr 15, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.25
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.25
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.39
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.67
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.59
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.24
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.84
D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.76
D
PhyloP100
6.1
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.57
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.6
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.81
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D
Vest4
0.95
MVP
0.96
MPC
0.18
ClinPred
0.34
T
GERP RS
5.9
gMVP
0.71
Mutation Taster
=24/76
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80359195; hg19: chr13-32968844; COSMIC: COSV99061634; API