13-32394828-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.9396A>G​(p.Lys3132Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000155 in 1,614,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.332
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 13-32394828-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32394828-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 184747.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32394828-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.332 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.9396A>G p.Lys3132Lys synonymous_variant 25/27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.9396A>G p.Lys3132Lys synonymous_variant 25/275 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.9027A>G p.Lys3009Lys synonymous_variant 25/271 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.*1454A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 24/262 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.*1454A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant 24/262 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000119
AC:
3
AN:
251368
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00000736
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135862
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000164
AC:
24
AN:
1461820
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000206
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
727214
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000450
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000828
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00000656
AC:
1
AN:
152328
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000240
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.00000378
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:14
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJun 02, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 15, 2019- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Jun 29, 2017Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthAug 15, 2023- -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 25, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25556971, 30254663) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoFeb 02, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenDec 01, 2022BRCA2: BP4, BP7 -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 09, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 28, 2016- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 27, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2 p.Lys3132= variant was identified in 1 of 2090 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0005) from individuals or families with breast of ovarian cancer (Zuntini, 2018). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs201172050) as "with other allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by ENIGMA expert panel, Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, Invitae and three other submitters; and as uncertain significance by this laboratory). The variant was not identified in the LOVD 3.0 or UMD-LSDB databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 3 of 246130 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00001 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 15302 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007), European (Non-Finnish) in 1 of 111626 chromosomes (freq: 0.000009), and South Asian in 1 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), while it was not observed in the Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or European (Finnish) populations. The p.Lys3132= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. However, 1 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predicts a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioNov 10, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
1.7
DANN
Benign
0.50

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201172050; hg19: chr13-32968965; API