13-32396988-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.9592T>C(p.Cys3198Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00011 in 1,614,002 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.9592T>C | p.Cys3198Arg | missense_variant | 26/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.9223T>C | p.Cys3075Arg | missense_variant | 26/27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*1650T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 25/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 | ||||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*1650T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 25/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000636 AC: 16AN: 251414Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000515 AC XY: 7AN XY: 135874
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000116 AC: 170AN: 1461792Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000976 AC XY: 71AN XY: 727202
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74358
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:3Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Jan 14, 2019 | This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Dec 04, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | Feb 20, 2004 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000368 - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | May 01, 2012 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 03, 2020 | In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21990134, 17924331, 26689913, 27060149, 23704879, 24323938, 25722345) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Nov 30, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jul 07, 2017 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 19, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jul 22, 2015 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Apr 25, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 01, 2024 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.9592T>C (p.Cys3198Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6.4e-05 in 251414 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00013 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (6.4e-05 vs 0.00075), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.9592T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with or at risk of breast cancer and lung adenocarcinoma (e.g. Lu_2012, Parry_2017), but it has also reported in non-cancer individuals (e.g. Kraemer_2019), including in 4/7325 women of European American descent over the age of 70 who have never had cancer (FLOSSIES database). Co-occurrences with pathogenic variants in the same gene have been reported in multiple cases (BRCA2 c.748delG, p.Val250Xfs; BRCA2 c.5863delT, p.Ser1955GlnfsX8; BRCA2 c.4965C>G, p.Tyr1655X; BIC database and Internal testing), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 33471991, 17924331, 24323938, 31422574, 28726806, 21990134, 22476429, 28843361, 30212499, 23704879). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 38252). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 08, 2023 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at