13-32398351-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4BP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.9838C>T(p.Pro3280Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000479 in 1,461,860 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000048 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.43

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.36478642).

BP6

Variant 13-32398351-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32398351-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 52905.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=3}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.9838C>T	p.Pro3280Ser	missense_variant	Exon 27 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.9838C>T	p.Pro3280Ser	missense_variant	Exon 27 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.9469C>T	p.Pro3157Ser	missense_variant	Exon 27 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.*1896C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 26 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.*1896C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 26 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

Cov.:

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000159

AC:

AN:

251294

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000221

AC XY:

AN XY:

135810

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000880

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000479

AC:

AN:

1461860

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000688

AC XY:

AN XY:

727234

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000270

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000331

GnomAD4 genome

Cov.:

Alfa

AF:

0.0000487

Hom.:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000165

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Sep 09, 2010

Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 20, 2004

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 13, 2023

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This missense variant replaces proline with serine at codon 3280 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). Splice site prediction tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. Experimental functional studies have been shown this variant to behaves similar to wild-type BRCA1 in homology directed recombination, cisplatin sensitivity, and complementation of BRCA2-deficient cells (PMID: 29988080), suggesting the variant does not contribute to disease. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has been identified in 4/251294 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Feb 28, 2020

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jun 14, 2023

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This missense variant replaces proline with serine at codon 3280 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have shown that this variant does not impact homology-directed DNA repair, cisplatin sensitivity, or complementation compared to wild-type BRCA2 (PMID: 29988080). This variant has been reported in two individuals affected with breast cancer (PMID: 31451522, 34178674). This variant has been identified in 4/251294 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Dec 21, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is denoted BRCA2 c.9838C>T at the cDNA level, p.Pro3280Ser (P3280S) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Proline to a Serine (CCT>TCT). Using alternate nomenclature, this variant would be defined as BRCA2 10066C>T. This variant showed complementation and homology directed repair capacity similar to wild type and did not significantly impact sensitivity to DNA damaging agents in in vitro functional studies (Mesman 2018). BRCA2 Pro3280Ser was not observed at a significant allele frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016). BRCA2 Pro3280Ser is not located in a known functional domain. In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether BRCA2 Pro3280Ser is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. -

not specified

Benign:1

Oct 21, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.9838C>T (p.Pro3280Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.6e-05 in 251294 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.9838C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer without evidence of causality (Ebrahimi_2019, Fanale_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (BRCA1 c.5145delC, BIC; BRCA2 c.755_758delACAG, UMD), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. A mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC)-based functional assay showed the variant to have proper complementation to loss of endogenous Brca2 and 125% HDR capacity compared to wild-type (Mesman_2018). Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Two laboratories classified it as uncertain significance and two as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Familial pancreatic carcinoma

Benign:1

Jun 13, 2024

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Dec 24, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.56

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.10

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.22

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.81

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.79

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

M_CAP

Benign

0.044

MetaRNN

Benign

0.36

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.2

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.52

PROVEAN

Benign

-2.3

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.24

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D

Vest4

0.42

MutPred

0.28

Loss of catalytic residue at P3280 (P = 0.0016);Loss of catalytic residue at P3280 (P = 0.0016);

MVP

0.93

MPC

0.17

ClinPred

0.76

GERP RS

5.7

gMVP

0.67

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over