13-32398499-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):ā€‹c.9986A>Gā€‹(p.Asn3329Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000279 in 1,614,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N3329H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000029 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.192
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.06747472).
BP6
Variant 13-32398499-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32398499-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 141780.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=3, Likely_benign=6, Benign=1}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.9986A>G p.Asn3329Ser missense_variant 27/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.9986A>G p.Asn3329Ser missense_variant 27/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152250
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000239
AC:
6
AN:
250776
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000147
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
135664
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000622
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000290
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000287
AC:
42
AN:
1461796
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000275
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
727212
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000897
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000279
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000497
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152250
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74390
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000151
ExAC
AF:
0.0000165
AC:
2

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJun 08, 2020The BRCA2 c.9986A>G; p.Asn3329Ser variant (rs76635144) is reported in the literature in a family affected with breast or ovarian cancer, but without clear evidence for disease association (Zuntini 2018). This variant is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 141780), and is only observed on six alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database, indicating it is not a common polymorphism. The asparagine at codon 3329 is weakly conserved, and computational analyses (SIFT, PolyPhen-2) predict that this variant is tolerated. Due to limited information, the clinical significance of the p.Asn3329Ser variant is uncertain at this time. References: Zuntini R et al. Dealing With BRCA1/2 Unclassified Variants in a Cancer Genetics Clinic: Does Cosegregation Analysis Help?. Front Genet. 2018;9:378. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 04, 2022In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 35264596 (2022)), ovarian cancer (PMID: 34157791 (2021)), prostate cancer (PMID: 21952622 (2011)), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (PMID: 31396961 (2020)). This variant has also been reported in unaffected individuals (PMID: 32467295 (2020), 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/BRCA2)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000024 (6/250776 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 06, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21952622) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Sep 18, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 30, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 08, 2015- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of BolognaSep 01, 2023BP1(Strong) according to ACMG/AMP classification guidelines specified for BRCA1 & BRCA2 (Classification Criteria V1.0.0 2023-09-08 - https://cspec.genome.network/cspec/ui/svi/affiliation/50087) (PMID: 38160042) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsAug 22, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthNov 30, 2023- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 24, 2022Variant summary: BRCA2 c.9986A>G (p.Asn3329Ser) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.4e-05 in 250776 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. Furthermore, the variant has been observed in at-least one woman in a database of women who are cancer free and older than age 70 (FLOSSIES database). c.9986A>G has been reported in the literature in at-least one individual affected with Prostate cancer (example, Kote-Jarai_2011) and as a VUS in one family undergoing testing for the BRCA1/2 genes (example, Zuntini_2018). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported at our laboratory (BRCA2 c.1755_1759delGAAAA, p.Lys585fsX3), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (likely benign, n=4; VUS, n=4) some of whom report overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeDec 31, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.058
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.52
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
0.023
DANN
Benign
0.64
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0083
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.029
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.067
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.91
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.22
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.070
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.064
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.61
T;T
Vest4
0.045
MutPred
0.092
Gain of phosphorylation at N3329 (P = 0.0613);Gain of phosphorylation at N3329 (P = 0.0613);
MVP
0.76
MPC
0.020
ClinPred
0.012
T
GERP RS
-2.5
gMVP
0.069

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs76635144; hg19: chr13-32972636; API