13-32398558-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.10045A>G(p.Thr3349Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000601 in 1,614,034 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000092 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000057 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
6
3
7
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.42
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.15431306).
BP6
Variant 13-32398558-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32398558-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 37719.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32398558-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.10045A>G | p.Thr3349Ala | missense_variant | 27/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.10045A>G | p.Thr3349Ala | missense_variant | 27/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000920 AC: 14AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
14
AN:
152196
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000112 AC: 28AN: 251090Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000103 AC XY: 14AN XY: 135728
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
251090
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
135728
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000568 AC: 83AN: 1461838Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000564 AC XY: 41AN XY: 727210
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
83
AN:
1461838
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
41
AN XY:
727210
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000920 AC: 14AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000941 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74360
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
14
AN:
152196
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
74360
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
AC:
6
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:17
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:4
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Jan 08, 2008 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Dec 01, 2023 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.0000000919 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 28, 2020 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.10045A>G (p.Thr3349Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00012 in 251290 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (0.00012 vs 0.00075), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.10045A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer without strong evidence of causality. One patient with the variant showed retention of the wild-type allele and loss of the allele harbouring the variant, suggesting the variant is not deleterious (Osorio_2002). Multifactorial models that incorporate family history, co-segregation, co-occurrence, and tumor pathology has predicted the variant to be likely neutral (Easton_2007, Lindor_2012). Multiple publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function: splicing is not affected (Houdayer_2012) and HDR and cell survival assays show no difference from WT controls (Mesman_2018), altogether suggesting the variant has no effect on protein function. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories and one expert panel (ENIGMA) have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All submitters classified the variant as benign (n=3)/likely benign (n=5). Several submitters cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 5/11516 Latino; ClinVar: 4 B/LB, 1 VUS - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 19, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jun 08, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Vantari Genetics | Feb 04, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Feb 03, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | May 05, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 24, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25637381, 21120943, 26420498, 10755399, 18403564, 22505045, 24323938, 21520273, 20104584, 12955716, 11979449, 25682074, 25348012, 17924331, 21990134, 29988080, 32123317) - |
Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Jun 01, 2014 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Pathogenic
D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
D;D
Vest4
MPC
0.16
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at