13-32398602-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.10089A>G​(p.Ile3363Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000044 in 1,613,836 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000045 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:11B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.51
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.033557475).
BP6
Variant 13-32398602-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32398602-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 51039.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=7}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkc.10089A>G p.Ile3363Met missense_variant Exon 27 of 27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkc.10089A>G p.Ile3363Met missense_variant Exon 27 of 27 5 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkc.9720A>G p.Ile3240Met missense_variant Exon 27 of 27 1 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.*2147A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 26 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.*2147A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 26 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
5
AN:
152206
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000876
AC:
22
AN:
251202
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000110
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
135774
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000616
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000452
AC:
66
AN:
1461630
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000619
AC XY:
45
AN XY:
727128
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000649
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000630
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
5
AN:
152206
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000538
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74364
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000658
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000151
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000906
AC:
11

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:11Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:4
Feb 20, 2004
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 29, 2024
St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA2 c.10089A>G (p.Ile3363Met) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.065% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with Fanconi anemia. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -

Mar 02, 2020
BRCAlab, Lund University
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 28, 2016
Molecular Diagnostics, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:2
Apr 28, 2016
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2021
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 10, 2022
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Aug 01, 2018
GeneKor MSA
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Feb 26, 2024
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.10089A>G (p.Ile3363Met) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8.8e-05 in 251202 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (8.8e-05 vs 0.00075), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.10089A>G has been reported in the literature as a VUS in individuals with breast cancer and in settings of multigene cancer panel testing (example, Cunningham_2014, Mehta_2018, Tsaousis_2019). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Additionally it has been observed in 2/9884 subjects in the FLOSSIES database. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 24504028, 31159747, 30555256). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 51039). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -

May 03, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

DNA sequence analysis of the BRCA2 gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.10089A>G, in exon 27 that results in an amino acid change, p.Ile3363Met. This sequence change has been described in gnomAD with a frequency of 0.065% in the South Asian sub-population (dbSNP rs80358390). The p.Ile3363Met change affects a poorly conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the BRCA2 protein that is known to be functional. The p.Ile3363Met substitution appears to be benign using several in-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL). This sequence change has been reported in two individuals with ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 30555256). Due to the lack of sufficient evidences and functional studies,, the clinical significance of the p.Ile3363Met change remains unknown at this time. -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Jun 14, 2023
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

BP4 -

Dec 17, 2019
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28099906, 24504028, 30555256, 31159747, 10923033, 31131967) -

Nov 11, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA2 c.10089A>G (p.Ile3363Met) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals with personal and/or family history of breast cancer (PMIDs: 37415649 (2023), 31159747 (2019)) and ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 30555256 (2018), 24504028 (2014)). This variant has been identified in reportedly healthy individuals (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/BRCA2)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00065 (20/30604 chromosomes in South Asian subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.Ile3363Met variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, ARUP Laboratories, and Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358390) “With other allele”, ClinVar (with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity; classified likely benign by Invitae, GeneDx and uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano, BIC and Centre for MolecularDiagnostics & Cell Biology (Rajiv Gandhi Caner Institute & Research Center)), Clinvitae (4x), UMD-LSDB (2x as 3-UV), BIC Database (1x with clinical importance unknown, classification pending), and in control databases in 24 of 276930 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00009 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 1 of 24010 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), European Non-Finnish in 2 of 126512 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), and South Asian in 21 of 30772 chromosomes (freq: 0.0007). while not observed in the Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and European Finnish populations. The p.Ile3363 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood Met impacts the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.073
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.64
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
0.031
DANN
Benign
0.90
Eigen
Benign
-1.6
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.6
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.022
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.061
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.034
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.89
T
PrimateAI
Benign
0.22
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.30
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.022
Sift
Benign
0.17
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.26
T;T
Vest4
0.027
MVP
0.63
MPC
0.020
ClinPred
0.030
T
GERP RS
-9.1
gMVP
0.082

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358390; hg19: chr13-32972739; API