13-52024890-A-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_001004127.3(ALG11):ā€‹c.1160A>Cā€‹(p.Glu387Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000787 in 1,613,206 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000047 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ALG11
NM_001004127.3 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.63
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALG11 (HGNC:32456): (ALG11 alpha-1,2-mannosyltransferase) This gene encodes a GDP-Man:Man3GlcNAc2-PP-dolichol-alpha1,2-mannosyltransferase which is localized to the cytosolic side of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and catalyzes the transfer of the fourth and fifth mannose residue from GDP-mannose (GDP-Man) to Man3GlcNAc2-PP-dolichol and Man4GlcNAc2-PP-dolichol resulting in the production of Man5GlcNAc2-PP-dolichol. Mutations in this gene are associated with congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ip (CDGIP). This gene overlaps but is distinct from the UTP14, U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein, homolog C (yeast) gene. A pseudogene of the GDP-Man:Man3GlcNAc2-PP-dolichol-alpha1,2-mannosyltransferase has been identified on chromosome 19. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
UTP14C (HGNC:20321): (UTP14C small subunit processome component) Predicted to be involved in several processes, including meiotic cell cycle; rRNA processing; and spermatogenesis. Located in cytosol and nucleolus. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.021051139).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000387 (59/152366) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00139 (58/41588). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00111. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 30 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ALG11NM_001004127.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1160A>C p.Glu387Ala missense_variant 3/4 ENST00000521508.2
UTP14CNM_021645.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.-534A>C 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/2 ENST00000521776.2
ALG11NR_036571.3 linkuse as main transcriptn.66-3429A>C intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ALG11ENST00000521508.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1160A>C p.Glu387Ala missense_variant 3/41 NM_001004127.3 P4
UTP14CENST00000521776.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-534A>C 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/21 NM_021645.6 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000388
AC:
59
AN:
152248
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00140
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000101
AC:
25
AN:
247802
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000104
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
134324
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00143
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000290
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000898
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000465
AC:
68
AN:
1460840
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000413
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
726750
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00185
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000270
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000387
AC:
59
AN:
152366
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000403
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
74510
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00139
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000514
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000472
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000908
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000148
AC:
18

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 17, 2022Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function -
ALG11-congenital disorder of glycosylation Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpNov 11, 2021Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may create or strengthen a splice site. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with ALG11-related conditions. This variant is present in population databases (rs115524395, gnomAD 0.1%). This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 387 of the ALG11 protein (p.Glu387Ala). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.098
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.36
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.30
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Benign
0.97
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.54
D
Eigen
Benign
-0.20
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.050
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.034
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.021
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.91
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.70
N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.31
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.3
N
REVEL
Benign
0.13
Sift
Benign
0.26
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.52
T
Polyphen
0.22
B
Vest4
0.15
MVP
0.77
MPC
0.049
ClinPred
0.036
T
GERP RS
3.4
Varity_R
0.16
gMVP
0.73

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115524395; hg19: chr13-52599026; API