13-76992103-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_006493.4(CLN5):c.5C>T(p.Ala2Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000385 in 1,611,760 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A2A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006493.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLN5 | NM_006493.4 | c.5C>T | p.Ala2Val | missense_variant | 1/4 | ENST00000377453.9 | |
CLN5 | NM_001366624.2 | c.5C>T | p.Ala2Val | missense_variant | 1/5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLN5 | ENST00000377453.9 | c.5C>T | p.Ala2Val | missense_variant | 1/4 | 1 | NM_006493.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000486 AC: 74AN: 152230Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000694 AC: 163AN: 234904Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000719 AC XY: 93AN XY: 129384
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000374 AC: 546AN: 1459530Hom.: 2 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000402 AC XY: 292AN XY: 726102
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000486 AC: 74AN: 152230Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000444 AC XY: 33AN XY: 74366
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 30, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 03, 2016 | - - |
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 5 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 10, 2021 | - - |
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Oct 22, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinosis, Dominant/Recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 25, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at