13-77898290-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001122659.3(EDNRB):ā€‹c.1239C>Gā€‹(p.Ser413Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00189 in 1,612,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0018 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0019 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

EDNRB
NM_001122659.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.36
Variant links:
Genes affected
EDNRB (HGNC:3180): (endothelin receptor type B) The protein encoded by this gene is a G protein-coupled receptor which activates a phosphatidylinositol-calcium second messenger system. Its ligand, endothelin, consists of a family of three potent vasoactive peptides: ET1, ET2, and ET3. Studies suggest that the multigenic disorder, Hirschsprung disease type 2, is due to mutations in the endothelin receptor type B gene. Alternative splicing and the use of alternative promoters results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 13-77898290-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-77898290-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 255140.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}. Variant chr13-77898290-G-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.36 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0019 (2779/1460098) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00957 (55/5750). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00755. There are 8 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 1422 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
EDNRBNM_001122659.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1239C>G p.Ser413Ser synonymous_variant 7/7 ENST00000646607.2 NP_001116131.1 P24530-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
EDNRBENST00000646607.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1239C>G p.Ser413Ser synonymous_variant 7/7 NM_001122659.3 ENSP00000493527.1 P24530-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00176
AC:
268
AN:
151892
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00178
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00779
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00256
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000959
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00203
AC:
507
AN:
249344
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00211
AC XY:
285
AN XY:
134874
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000493
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00186
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00726
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000463
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00268
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00477
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00190
AC:
2779
AN:
1460098
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00196
AC XY:
1422
AN XY:
726350
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000539
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00184
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00737
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00101
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00195
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00279
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00176
AC:
268
AN:
152010
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00162
AC XY:
120
AN XY:
74292
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00177
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00779
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00256
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000949
Alfa
AF:
0.00212
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00198
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00338
EpiControl
AF:
0.00374

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 25, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMay 01, 2024EDNRB: BP4, BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 16, 2021- -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineNov 24, 2014Ser503Ser in exon 8 of EDNRB: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located with in the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.3% (27/8600) of Eu ropean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS). -
Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
CADD
Benign
7.9
DANN
Benign
0.74

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs139317762; hg19: chr13-78472425; API