14-101964852-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 1P and 7B. PP2BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):​c.161C>T​(p.Ala54Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000488 in 1,598,042 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000051 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC1H1
NM_001376.5 missense

Scores

1
3
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.48
Variant links:
Genes affected
DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in the DYNC1H1 gene, where missense mutations are typically associated with disease (based on misZ statistic). The gene has 122 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 287 curated benign missense variants. Gene score misZ: 10.967 (above the threshold of 3.09). Trascript score misZ: 16.053 (above the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disability, neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 13, autosomal dominant childhood-onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy without contractures, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.16652802).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000263 (4/152196) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0000588 (4/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000197. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 3 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 74 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DYNC1H1NM_001376.5 linkc.161C>T p.Ala54Val missense_variant Exon 1 of 78 ENST00000360184.10 NP_001367.2 Q14204

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DYNC1H1ENST00000360184.10 linkc.161C>T p.Ala54Val missense_variant Exon 1 of 78 1 NM_001376.5 ENSP00000348965.4 Q14204

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000263
AC:
4
AN:
152196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000140
AC:
3
AN:
213952
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00000852
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
117386
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000821
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000214
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000512
AC:
74
AN:
1445846
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000488
AC XY:
35
AN XY:
717860
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000300
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000651
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000168
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000263
AC:
4
AN:
152196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000404
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74346
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000434
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000189
ExAC
AF:
0.00000837
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Uncertain:1Benign:1
Mar 28, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Oct 28, 2020
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.A54V variant (also known as c.161C>T), located in coding exon 1 of the DYNC1H1 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 161. The alanine at codon 54 is replaced by valine, an amino acid with similar properties. This missense alteration is located in a region that has a low rate of benign missense variation (Lek M et al. Nature. 2016 Aug 18;536(7616):285-91; DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans using Ensembl Resources. Firth H.V. et al. 2009. Am.J.Hum.Genet. 84, 524-533 (DOI: dx.doi.org/10/1016/j.ajhg.2009.03.010)). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.078
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.15
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.46
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.36
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.22
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.041
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.66
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.23
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.17
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.87
D
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
N
REVEL
Benign
0.050
Sift
Benign
0.032
D
Polyphen
0.043
B
Vest4
0.25
MutPred
0.23
Loss of helix (P = 0.028);
MVP
0.33
MPC
1.2
ClinPred
0.71
D
GERP RS
4.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.9
Varity_R
0.52
gMVP
0.40

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs772070566; hg19: chr14-102431189; API