14-102009850-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):c.5985C>T(p.Ala1995Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000643 in 1,613,936 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00065 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC1H1
NM_001376.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.805

Variant links:

Genes affected

DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

DYNC1H1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.25).

BP6

Variant 14-102009850-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-102009850-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 210873.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr14-102009850-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.805 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000533 (81/152052) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00131 (20/15260). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000868. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 39 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 81 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DYNC1H1	NM_001376.5 link	c.5985C>T	p.Ala1995Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 30 of 78	ENST00000360184.10	NP_001367.2	Q14204

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DYNC1H1	ENST00000360184.10 link	c.5985C>T	p.Ala1995Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 30 of 78	1	NM_001376.5	ENSP00000348965.4		Q14204

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000533

AC:

AN:

152052

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000121

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000945

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000809

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000493

AC:

124

AN:

251432

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000515

AC XY:

AN XY:

135902

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000723

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000992

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000835

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000655

AC:

957

AN:

1461884

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000671

AC XY:

488

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000179

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000693

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000806

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000381

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000533

AC:

AN:

152052

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000525

AC XY:

AN XY:

74266

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000121

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0000945

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000809

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000671

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000529

EpiCase

AF:

0.000872

EpiControl

AF:

0.000771

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O

Benign:2

Jan 19, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Dec 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

DYNC1H1: BP4, BP7 -

Apr 18, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O;C3281202:Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 13;C5780022:Autosomal dominant childhood-onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy without contractures

Uncertain:1

Mar 30, 2021

Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

DYNC1H1 NM_001376 exon 30 p.Ala1995Ala (c.5985C>T): This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in 103/126648 European alleles, including 1 homozygote in the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/rs140841480). This variant is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:210873). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are limited or unavailable. Of note, this variant is a silent variant and does not change the amino acid, reducing the probability that this variant is disease causing. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Benign:1

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

May 30, 2017

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

May 22, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

DYNC1H1-related disorder

Benign:1

Dec 20, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.25

CADD

Benign

9.1

DANN

Benign

0.76

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.8

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over