14-102930718-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_030943.4(AMN):c.*38G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000492 in 1,546,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_030943.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Imerslund-Grasbeck syndrome type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Imerslund-Grasbeck syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_030943.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMN | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.*38G>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 12 of 12 | ENSP00000299155.6 | Q9BXJ7-1 | |||
| AMN | c.*38G>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 12 of 12 | ENSP00000543058.1 | |||||
| AMN | TSL:2 | n.2146G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 11 of 11 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152108Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000536 AC: 8AN: 149292 AF XY: 0.0000371 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000459 AC: 64AN: 1394026Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000450 AC XY: 31AN XY: 688640 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152108Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0000942 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74304 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at