14-104714228-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_022489.4(INF2):​c.3066T>C​(p.Asp1022Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.772 in 1,556,818 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 465,065 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.80 ( 48839 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.77 ( 416226 hom. )

Consequence

INF2
NM_022489.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0870
Variant links:
Genes affected
INF2 (HGNC:23791): (inverted formin 2) This gene represents a member of the formin family of proteins. It is considered a diaphanous formin due to the presence of a diaphanous inhibitory domain located at the N-terminus of the encoded protein. Studies of a similar mouse protein indicate that the protein encoded by this locus may function in polymerization and depolymerization of actin filaments. Mutations at this locus have been associated with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.94).
BP6
Variant 14-104714228-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-104714228-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 261613.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-104714228-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.087 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.908 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
INF2NM_022489.4 linkc.3066T>C p.Asp1022Asp synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 23 ENST00000392634.9 NP_071934.3 Q27J81-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
INF2ENST00000392634.9 linkc.3066T>C p.Asp1022Asp synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 23 5 NM_022489.4 ENSP00000376410.4 Q27J81-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.799
AC:
121428
AN:
152000
Hom.:
48799
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.867
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.720
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.833
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.794
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.930
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.735
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.744
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.791
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.753
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.820
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.787
AC:
142897
AN:
181548
Hom.:
56711
AF XY:
0.778
AC XY:
76100
AN XY:
97840
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.865
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.850
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.800
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.934
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.730
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.722
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.752
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.776
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.769
AC:
1079694
AN:
1404700
Hom.:
416226
Cov.:
59
AF XY:
0.766
AC XY:
531282
AN XY:
693164
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.875
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.848
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.800
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.922
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.735
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.735
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.760
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.780
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.799
AC:
121523
AN:
152118
Hom.:
48839
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.799
AC XY:
59386
AN XY:
74342
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.867
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.833
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.794
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.930
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.734
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.744
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.753
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.819
Alfa
AF:
0.746
Hom.:
7189
Bravo
AF:
0.813
Asia WGS
AF:
0.852
AC:
2961
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2024
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 98% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy. Number of patients: 91. Only high quality variants are reported. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 21, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Apr 25, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5;C4302667:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate E Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate E Benign:1
Aug 19, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.94
CADD
Benign
1.1
DANN
Benign
0.33

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4983535; hg19: chr14-105180565; COSMIC: COSV53036802; COSMIC: COSV53036802; API