14-36520113-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6_Moderate
The NM_001079668.3(NKX2-1):c.17G>A(p.Ser6Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,460,902 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 10/16 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001079668.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NKX2-1 | NM_001079668.3 | c.17G>A | p.Ser6Asn | missense_variant | 1/3 | ENST00000354822.7 | NP_001073136.1 | |
NKX2-1-AS1 | NR_103710.1 | n.402+434C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NKX2-1 | ENST00000354822.7 | c.17G>A | p.Ser6Asn | missense_variant | 1/3 | 1 | NM_001079668.3 | ENSP00000346879 | P4 | |
NKX2-1-AS1 | ENST00000521292.2 | n.402+434C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 2 | ||||||
ENST00000634305.1 | n.322+71276C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000417 AC: 1AN: 240044Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000759 AC XY: 1AN XY: 131744
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1460902Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726798
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 03, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at