14-47061409-C-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4BP6
The NM_001113498.3(MDGA2):āc.1365G>Cā(p.Met455Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,506 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes š: 6.8e-7 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MDGA2
NM_001113498.3 missense
NM_001113498.3 missense
Scores
2
5
12
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.04
Genes affected
MDGA2 (HGNC:19835): (MAM domain containing glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor 2) Predicted to be involved in regulation of presynapse assembly; regulation of synaptic membrane adhesion; and spinal cord motor neuron differentiation. Predicted to act upstream of or within neuron migration and pattern specification process. Predicted to be located in extracellular region and plasma membrane. Predicted to be active in GABA-ergic synapse and glutamatergic synapse. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.33542892).
BP6
Variant 14-47061409-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-47061409-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 2681390.Status of the report is no_assertion_criteria_provided, 0 stars.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDGA2 | NM_001113498.3 | c.1365G>C | p.Met455Ile | missense_variant | 7/17 | ENST00000399232.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDGA2 | ENST00000399232.8 | c.1365G>C | p.Met455Ile | missense_variant | 7/17 | 1 | NM_001113498.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000402 AC: 1AN: 248974Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135036
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
248974
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
135036
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461506Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727046
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
1461506
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
727046
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
ExAC
AF:
AC:
1
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: no assertion criteria provided
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
EBV-positive nodal T- and NK-cell lymphoma Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Department of Clinical Pathology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;.;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
.;.;N
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;.
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
.;T;.
Polyphen
0.60
.;.;P
Vest4
0.74
MutPred
0.55
.;.;Gain of catalytic residue at T391 (P = 0.0465);
MVP
MPC
0.64
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at