14-49633965-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_018139.3(DNAAF2):​c.1185G>C​(p.Ala395Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.728 in 1,527,492 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 415,888 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.71 ( 39476 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.73 ( 376412 hom. )

Consequence

DNAAF2
NM_018139.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.81

Publications

20 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAAF2 (HGNC:20188): (dynein axonemal assembly factor 2) This gene encodes a highly conserved protein involved in the preassembly of dynein arm complexes which power cilia. These complexes are found in some cilia and are assembled in the cytoplasm prior to transport for cilia formation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
DNAAF2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia 10
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, ClinGen
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).
BP6
Variant 14-49633965-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-49633965-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 95891.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.81 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.758 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DNAAF2NM_018139.3 linkc.1185G>C p.Ala395Ala synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 3 ENST00000298292.13 NP_060609.2
DNAAF2NM_001083908.2 linkc.1185G>C p.Ala395Ala synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 2 NP_001077377.1
DNAAF2NM_001378453.1 linkc.-687G>C 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 2 NP_001365382.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNAAF2ENST00000298292.13 linkc.1185G>C p.Ala395Ala synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 3 1 NM_018139.3 ENSP00000298292.8
DNAAF2ENST00000406043.3 linkc.1185G>C p.Ala395Ala synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 2 1 ENSP00000384862.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.709
AC:
107811
AN:
151974
Hom.:
39446
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.692
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.828
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.691
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.728
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.147
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.534
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.795
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.728
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.763
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.710
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.644
AC:
79450
AN:
123412
AF XY:
0.641
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.686
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.628
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.728
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.147
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.774
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.764
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.691
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.730
AC:
1004113
AN:
1375408
Hom.:
376412
Cov.:
83
AF XY:
0.725
AC XY:
491876
AN XY:
678326
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.681
AC:
21152
AN:
31054
American (AMR)
AF:
0.637
AC:
22132
AN:
34720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.736
AC:
18139
AN:
24652
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.118
AC:
4157
AN:
35306
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.548
AC:
42977
AN:
78382
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.772
AC:
26076
AN:
33758
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.678
AC:
2940
AN:
4338
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.768
AC:
826629
AN:
1075798
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.695
AC:
39911
AN:
57400
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
17199
34397
51596
68794
85993
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
19920
39840
59760
79680
99600
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.709
AC:
107891
AN:
152084
Hom.:
39476
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.705
AC XY:
52424
AN XY:
74358
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.692
AC:
28721
AN:
41486
American (AMR)
AF:
0.691
AC:
10581
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.728
AC:
2527
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.147
AC:
755
AN:
5146
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.533
AC:
2569
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.795
AC:
8427
AN:
10594
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.738
AC:
214
AN:
290
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.763
AC:
51845
AN:
67940
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.709
AC:
1497
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1532
3064
4596
6128
7660
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
808
1616
2424
3232
4040
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.695
Hom.:
4655
Bravo
AF:
0.700
Asia WGS
AF:
0.405
AC:
1403
AN:
3472

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 21, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ala395Ala in exon 1 of DNAAF2: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 81.2% (138/170) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the 1000 Genomes Projec t (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP; dbSNP rs2985686).

Jul 22, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 10 Benign:3
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 26, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

not provided Benign:2
Nov 09, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.67
CADD
Benign
0.50
DANN
Benign
0.61
PhyloP100
-1.8
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2985686; hg19: chr14-50100683; COSMIC: COSV53567384; COSMIC: COSV53567384; API