14-53950399-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001202.6(BMP4):c.860G>A(p.Arg287His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0005 in 1,613,658 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001202.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMP4 | NM_001202.6 | c.860G>A | p.Arg287His | missense_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000245451.9 | NP_001193.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMP4 | ENST00000245451.9 | c.860G>A | p.Arg287His | missense_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_001202.6 | ENSP00000245451.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00137 AC: 208AN: 152248Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000818 AC: 205AN: 250560Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000745 AC XY: 101AN XY: 135600
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000410 AC: 599AN: 1461292Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000391 AC XY: 284AN XY: 726868
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00137 AC: 208AN: 152366Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00144 AC XY: 107AN XY: 74508
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Orofacial cleft 11 Pathogenic:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Mar 01, 2009 | - - |
Microphthalmia with brain and digit anomalies Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Microphthalmia with brain and digit anomalies;C2677434:Orofacial cleft 11 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 13, 2023 | - - |
BMP4-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 14, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at