14-54902596-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000161.3(GCH1):c.68C>T(p.Pro23Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.005 in 1,500,604 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 28 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0038 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0051 ( 27 hom. )

Consequence

GCH1
NM_000161.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.396

Variant links:

Genes affected

GCH1 (HGNC:4193): (GTP cyclohydrolase 1) This gene encodes a member of the GTP cyclohydrolase family. The encoded protein is the first and rate-limiting enzyme in tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) biosynthesis, catalyzing the conversion of GTP into 7,8-dihydroneopterin triphosphate. BH4 is an essential cofactor required by aromatic amino acid hydroxylases as well as nitric oxide synthases. Mutations in this gene are associated with malignant hyperphenylalaninemia and dopa-responsive dystonia. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described; however, not all variants give rise to a functional enzyme. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

GCH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

PM1

In a chain GTP cyclohydrolase 1 (size 249) in uniprot entity GCH1_HUMAN there are 25 pathogenic changes around while only 3 benign (89%) in NM_000161.3

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0065107644).

BP6

Variant 14-54902596-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-54902596-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 313398.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=6, Likely_benign=3}. Variant chr14-54902596-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00382 (582/152242) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0064 (435/67990). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0059. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 266 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 27 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GCH1	NM_000161.3 link	c.68C>T	p.Pro23Leu	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 6	ENST00000491895.7	NP_000152.1	P30793-1A0A024R642

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GCH1	ENST00000491895.7 link	c.68C>T	p.Pro23Leu	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 6	1	NM_000161.3	ENSP00000419045.2		P30793-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00383

AC:

582

AN:

152130

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000868

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00380

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00778

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00227

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000660

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00318

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00640

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00334

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00426

AC:

429

AN:

100738

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00403

AC XY:

227

AN XY:

56270

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00168

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00215

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0118

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00326

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000855

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00637

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00465

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00513

AC:

6918

AN:

1348362

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00500

AC XY:

3325

AN XY:

664528

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000779

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00261

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0120

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00280

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000690

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00564

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00530

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00382

AC:

582

AN:

152242

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00357

AC XY:

266

AN XY:

74436

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000866

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00379

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00778

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00228

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000660

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00640

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00331

Alfa

AF:

0.00568

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00399

ExAC

AF:

0.00191

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:7

Jan 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

GCH1: BS2 -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 04, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31213404, 30314816, 25497597, 9328244, 19332422, 24993959) -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 29, 2017

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 04, 2016

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

GTP cyclohydrolase I deficiency;C1851920:Dystonia 5

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2020

Elsea Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

GTP cyclohydrolase I deficiency

Benign:2

Mar 06, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Mar 28, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Reported in 1 individual with dystonia in trans with a nonsense variant (Jarman 1997). In a family with 2 members, it was identified in 2 affected individuals with DOPA-responsive dystonia and 1 with Parkinsons, this variant was identified in 1 individual with dystonia and 1 with Parkinsons (who also had a Phe104Leu variant) (Mencacci 2014). One of the family members with dystonia only had the Phe104Leu variant. This variant was described as benign due to its MAF. MAF 1.5% in Eur chr. -

GCH1-related disorder

Benign:1

Oct 06, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Dystonia 5

Benign:1

Mar 06, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.086

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.044

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.17

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.85

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.41

T;T;.;T;.

Eigen

Benign

-1.3

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.3

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.13

LIST_S2

Benign

0.68

.;T;T;.;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0065

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Pathogenic

1.3

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.60

N;N;N;N;N

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.80

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.99

.;N;N;N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.61

Sift

Benign

0.42

.;T;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.49

T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0

B;B;B;B;B

Vest4

0.088

MVP

1.0

MPC

1.1

ClinPred

0.0032

GERP RS

0.20

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.076

gMVP

0.36

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over