14-75017109-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001040108.2(MLH3):āc.4335A>Gā(p.Gln1445Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.536 in 1,612,868 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 236,314 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.53 ( 21708 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.54 ( 214606 hom. )
Consequence
MLH3
NM_001040108.2 synonymous
NM_001040108.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.637
Genes affected
MLH3 (HGNC:7128): (mutL homolog 3) This gene is a member of the MutL-homolog (MLH) family of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. MLH genes are implicated in maintaining genomic integrity during DNA replication and after meiotic recombination. The protein encoded by this gene functions as a heterodimer with other family members. Somatic mutations in this gene frequently occur in tumors exhibiting microsatellite instability, and germline mutations have been linked to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer type 7 (HNPCC7). Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified, but the full-length nature of only two transcript variants has been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 14-75017109-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-75017109-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 257253.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-75017109-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr14-75017109-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.637 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.816 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLH3 | NM_001040108.2 | c.4335A>G | p.Gln1445Gln | synonymous_variant | 13/13 | ENST00000355774.7 | NP_001035197.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLH3 | ENST00000355774.7 | c.4335A>G | p.Gln1445Gln | synonymous_variant | 13/13 | 5 | NM_001040108.2 | ENSP00000348020.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.526 AC: 79996AN: 152034Hom.: 21692 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
79996
AN:
152034
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.575 AC: 144593AN: 251482Hom.: 43389 AF XY: 0.564 AC XY: 76668AN XY: 135912
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
144593
AN:
251482
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
76668
AN XY:
135912
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.537 AC: 784611AN: 1460716Hom.: 214606 Cov.: 39 AF XY: 0.535 AC XY: 389080AN XY: 726696
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
784611
AN:
1460716
Hom.:
Cov.:
39
AF XY:
AC XY:
389080
AN XY:
726696
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.526 AC: 80052AN: 152152Hom.: 21708 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.529 AC XY: 39380AN XY: 74386
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
80052
AN:
152152
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
39380
AN XY:
74386
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2099
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 30, 2020 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 7 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 22, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at