14-75049227-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001040108.2(MLH3):​c.429G>A​(p.Gly143Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000251 in 1,614,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

MLH3
NM_001040108.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.544
Variant links:
Genes affected
MLH3 (HGNC:7128): (mutL homolog 3) This gene is a member of the MutL-homolog (MLH) family of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. MLH genes are implicated in maintaining genomic integrity during DNA replication and after meiotic recombination. The protein encoded by this gene functions as a heterodimer with other family members. Somatic mutations in this gene frequently occur in tumors exhibiting microsatellite instability, and germline mutations have been linked to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer type 7 (HNPCC7). Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified, but the full-length nature of only two transcript variants has been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
BP6
Variant 14-75049227-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-75049227-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 238250.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.544 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00144 (220/152308) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00513 (213/41554). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00456. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 109 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 220 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MLH3NM_001040108.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.429G>A p.Gly143Gly synonymous_variant 2/13 ENST00000355774.7 NP_001035197.1 Q9UHC1-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MLH3ENST00000355774.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.429G>A p.Gly143Gly synonymous_variant 2/135 NM_001040108.2 ENSP00000348020.2 Q9UHC1-1
MLH3ENST00000380968.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.429G>A p.Gly143Gly synonymous_variant 2/121 ENSP00000370355.3 Q9UHC1-2
MLH3ENST00000556257.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.429G>A p.Gly143Gly synonymous_variant 2/75 ENSP00000451540.1 G3V419
MLH3ENST00000553263.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.429G>A p.Gly143Gly synonymous_variant 2/22 ENSP00000451192.1 G3V3E0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00142
AC:
216
AN:
152190
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00504
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000346
AC:
87
AN:
251432
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000235
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
135894
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00480
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000202
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000127
AC:
185
AN:
1461878
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.000107
AC XY:
78
AN XY:
727242
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00463
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000268
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000232
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00144
AC:
220
AN:
152308
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00146
AC XY:
109
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00513
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000945
Alfa
AF:
0.000697
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00163
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 7 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 24, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 18, 2020This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
MLH3-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJan 06, 2020This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
CADD
Benign
1.9
DANN
Benign
0.68

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs138943686; hg19: chr14-75515930; API