14-76491724-C-T

Variant names:

• chr14-76491724-C-T
• rs373429794
• NM_001379180.1:c.1120+8C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_Strong BP6 BS1 BS2

The NM_001379180.1(ESRRB):​c.1120+8C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00386 in 1,568,782 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 (2 hom., cov: 34)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0040 (17 hom.)
• Consequence: ESRRB NM_001379180.1 splice_region, intron
• Scores: Splicing: ADA: 0.00005506
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1 B:5
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.552

Genes affected

ESRRB (HGNC:3473): (estrogen related receptor beta) This gene encodes a protein with similarity to the estrogen receptor. Its function is unknown; however, a similar protein in mouse plays an essential role in placental development. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
• BP6: Variant 14-76491724-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-76491724-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 163421.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr14-76491724-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00215 (327/152348) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00401 (273/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00362. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 146 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ESRRB	NM_001379180.1	c.1120+8C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 6 of 6	ENST00000644823.1	NP_001366109.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ESRRB	ENST00000644823.1	c.1120+8C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 6 of 6		NM_001379180.1	ENSP00000493776.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00215 AC: 327 AN: 152230 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 34

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000796

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000785

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.000193

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.000377

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00401

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00143

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00180 AC: 320 AN: 177702 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00198 AC XY: 187 AN XY: 94392

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000913

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000549

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.000250

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.000558

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00372

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00147

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00404 AC: 5722 AN: 1416434 Hom.: 17 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00386 AC XY: 2705 AN XY: 699872

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000726

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000436

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0000260

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.000137

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.000838

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00500

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00310

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00215 AC: 327 AN: 152348 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00196 AC XY: 146 AN XY: 74498

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000793

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000784

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.000377

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00401

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00142

Alfa AF: 0.00211 Hom.: 2

Bravo AF: 0.00216

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3

Jun 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

ESRRB: BP4, BS2 -

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 14, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2

Apr 30, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

1057+8C>T in Intron 08 of ESRRB: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus sequ ence and has been identified in 0.4% (26/6982) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.was hington.edu/EVS). -

Apr 14, 2020

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 35 Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.83
CADD	Benign	1.3
DANN	Benign	0.87

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA	Benign	0.000055
dbscSNV1_RF	Benign	0.0
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs373429794; hg19: chr14-76958067;