14-76499975-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_004452.4(ESRRB):​c.1409C>T​(p.Pro470Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000943 in 1,600,692 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00081 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00096 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

ESRRB
NM_004452.4 missense

Scores

2
15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0320
Variant links:
Genes affected
ESRRB (HGNC:3473): (estrogen related receptor beta) This gene encodes a protein with similarity to the estrogen receptor. Its function is unknown; however, a similar protein in mouse plays an essential role in placental development. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0043939054).
BP6
Variant 14-76499975-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-76499975-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 163424.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000808 (123/152272) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00456 (22/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00309. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 61 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ESRRBNM_001379180.1 linkc.*1517C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 7 of 7 ENST00000644823.1 NP_001366109.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ESRRBENST00000644823.1 linkc.*1517C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 7 of 7 NM_001379180.1 ENSP00000493776.1 A0A2R8Y491

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000808
AC:
123
AN:
152154
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00455
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000426
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00132
AC:
295
AN:
223360
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00152
AC XY:
182
AN XY:
119624
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000732
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000480
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000240
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00443
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000490
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000495
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000708
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000957
AC:
1386
AN:
1448420
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00107
AC XY:
768
AN XY:
718748
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000150
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000306
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0113
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000508
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00455
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000570
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000531
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00155
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000808
AC:
123
AN:
152272
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000819
AC XY:
61
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000144
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000387
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00456
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000426
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00237
Alfa
AF:
0.000983
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.000865
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000809
AC:
3
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000943
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.00114
AC:
138
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Apr 10, 2017
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 18, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Pro470Leu in exon 10 of ESRRB: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 0.6% (62/10790) of South Asian chr omosomes, including 1 homozygote, by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, htt p://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs201726554). -

not provided Benign:2
Sep 12, 2019
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 28, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 35 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

ESRRB-related disorder Benign:1
Dec 09, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.37
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.31
CADD
Benign
5.1
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.019
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.43
.;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.014
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0044
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.43
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.34
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.21
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.060
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.13
Sift
Uncertain
0.0050
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.23
T;T
Vest4
0.067
MVP
0.36
MPC
0.39
ClinPred
0.013
T
GERP RS
0.43
gMVP
0.10

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201726554; hg19: chr14-76966318; API