14-88396185-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_018418.5(SPATA7):c.220G>A(p.Val74Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.344 in 1,604,060 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 98,114 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018418.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPATA7 | NM_018418.5 | c.220G>A | p.Val74Met | missense_variant | 4/12 | ENST00000393545.9 | NP_060888.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPATA7 | ENST00000393545.9 | c.220G>A | p.Val74Met | missense_variant | 4/12 | 1 | NM_018418.5 | ENSP00000377176.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.387 AC: 58689AN: 151648Hom.: 12175 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.337 AC: 84495AN: 250882Hom.: 14984 AF XY: 0.337 AC XY: 45648AN XY: 135624
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.339 AC: 492221AN: 1452296Hom.: 85909 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.340 AC XY: 245935AN XY: 722918
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.387 AC: 58790AN: 151764Hom.: 12205 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.380 AC XY: 28204AN XY: 74136
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Leber congenital amaurosis 3 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 04, 2016 | - - |
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University | Oct 01, 2023 | - - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at