14-90578192-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001010854.2(TTC7B):c.2224C>A(p.Leu742Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00644 in 1,614,154 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 37 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001010854.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTC7B | NM_001010854.2 | c.2224C>A | p.Leu742Ile | missense_variant | 19/20 | ENST00000328459.11 | |
TTC7B | NM_001401365.1 | c.2437C>A | p.Leu813Ile | missense_variant | 21/22 | ||
TTC7B | NM_001320421.2 | c.1969C>A | p.Leu657Ile | missense_variant | 20/21 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTC7B | ENST00000328459.11 | c.2224C>A | p.Leu742Ile | missense_variant | 19/20 | 1 | NM_001010854.2 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00426 AC: 649AN: 152264Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00405 AC: 1015AN: 250748Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00405 AC XY: 549AN XY: 135644
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00667 AC: 9750AN: 1461772Hom.: 35 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00638 AC XY: 4641AN XY: 727168
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00426 AC: 649AN: 152382Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00401 AC XY: 299AN XY: 74520
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 13, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at