14-91881279-C-T

Position:

• chr14-91881279-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_006329.4(FBLN5):​c.989+13G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00308 in 1,613,864 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 104 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 (52 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 (52 hom.)
• Consequence: FBLN5 NM_006329.4 intron
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.332

Genes affected

FBLN5 (HGNC:3602): (fibulin 5) The protein encoded by this gene is a secreted, extracellular matrix protein containing an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif and calcium-binding EGF-like domains. It promotes adhesion of endothelial cells through interaction of integrins and the RGD motif. It is prominently expressed in developing arteries but less so in adult vessels. However, its expression is reinduced in balloon-injured vessels and atherosclerotic lesions, notably in intimal vascular smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells. Therefore, the protein encoded by this gene may play a role in vascular development and remodeling. Defects in this gene are a cause of autosomal dominant cutis laxa, autosomal recessive cutis laxa type I (CL type I), and age-related macular degeneration type 3 (ARMD3). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

FBLN5 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
• BP6: Variant 14-91881279-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-91881279-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 163455.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-91881279-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0131 (1994/152206) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0446 (1851/41516). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0429. There are 52 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 940 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 52 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FBLN5	NM_006329.4	c.989+13G>A		intron_variant		ENST00000342058.9	NP_006320.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FBLN5	ENST00000342058.9	c.989+13G>A		intron_variant		1	NM_006329.4	ENSP00000345008.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0131 AC: 1993 AN: 152088 Hom.: 52 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0447

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00360

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.000193

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.0120

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000103

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.0105

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00494 AC: 1242 AN: 251284 Hom.: 30 AF XY: 0.00444 AC XY: 603 AN XY: 135796

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0485

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00188

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0120

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000114

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00163

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00203 AC: 2969 AN: 1461658 Hom.: 52 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00212 AC XY: 1545 AN XY: 727148

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0489

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00219

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0000756

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0110

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000432

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00364

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0131 AC: 1994 AN: 152206 Hom.: 52 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0126 AC XY: 940 AN XY: 74414

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0446

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00360

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.0120

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000103

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.0104

Alfa AF: 0.00563 Hom.: 3

Bravo AF: 0.0145

Asia WGS AF: 0.00837 AC: 29 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Dec 21, 2016	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	Feb 21, 2013	989+13G>A in intron 9 of FBLN5: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus seque nce. It has been identified in 4.3% (188/4406) of African American chromosomes f rom a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.wash ington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs74071605). -

not provided Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 31, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Mar 01, 2022	- -

Macular degeneration, age-related, 3 Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cutis laxa Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.83
CADD	Benign	2.0
DANN	Benign	0.36

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs74071605; hg19: chr14-92347623;