14-95126586-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2

The NM_177438.3(DICER1):​c.897G>A​(p.Ser299Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000483 in 1,512,622 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S299S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000049 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DICER1
NM_177438.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.773

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DICER1 (HGNC:17098): (dicer 1, ribonuclease III) This gene encodes a protein possessing an RNA helicase motif containing a DEXH box in its amino terminus and an RNA motif in the carboxy terminus. The encoded protein functions as a ribonuclease and is required by the RNA interference and small temporal RNA (stRNA) pathways to produce the active small RNA component that represses gene expression. This protein also acts as a strong antiviral agent with activity against RNA viruses, including the Zika and SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2021]
DICER1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • DICER1-related tumor predisposition
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • pleuropulmonary blastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • DICER1 syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • global developmental delay - lung cysts - overgrowth - Wilms tumor syndrome
    Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.38).
BP6
Variant 14-95126586-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-95126586-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 315112.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.773 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 6 AD,Unknown gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DICER1NM_177438.3 linkc.897G>A p.Ser299Ser synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 27 ENST00000343455.8 NP_803187.1 Q9UPY3-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DICER1ENST00000343455.8 linkc.897G>A p.Ser299Ser synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 27 1 NM_177438.3 ENSP00000343745.3 Q9UPY3-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000395
AC:
6
AN:
152000
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000638
AC:
16
AN:
250768
AF XY:
0.0000663
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000290
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000115
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000492
AC:
67
AN:
1360504
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
0.0000440
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
682042
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
31300
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000225
AC:
1
AN:
44520
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25506
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39090
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
83888
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53304
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000188
AC:
1
AN:
5314
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000607
AC:
62
AN:
1020656
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000527
AC:
3
AN:
56926
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.438
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
10
13
16
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152118
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74386
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41504
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10552
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000735
AC:
5
AN:
67998
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000387
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000642
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000546
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

DICER1-related tumor predisposition Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jan 21, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Sep 11, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Aug 09, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

not specified Benign:1
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

DICER1-related disorder Benign:1
Jun 08, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not provided Benign:1
May 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

DICER1: BP4, BP7 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.38
CADD
Benign
9.3
DANN
Benign
0.63
PhyloP100
0.77

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201842071; hg19: chr14-95592923; COSMIC: COSV58619516; COSMIC: COSV58619516; API