14-96556241-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_032632.5(PAPOLA):c.1832C>T(p.Thr611Met) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000527 in 1,613,944 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T611A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032632.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAPOLA | NM_032632.5 | c.1832C>T | p.Thr611Met | missense_variant | Exon 19 of 22 | ENST00000216277.13 | NP_116021.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152088Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000557 AC: 14AN: 251440 AF XY: 0.0000589 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000479 AC: 70AN: 1461856Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000536 AC XY: 39AN XY: 727232 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152088Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000108 AC XY: 8AN XY: 74300 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.1832C>T (p.T611M) alteration is located in exon 19 (coding exon 19) of the PAPOLA gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 1832, causing the threonine (T) at amino acid position 611 to be replaced by a methionine (M). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at