14-96833516-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_003384.3(VRK1):​c.45A>G​(p.Ala15Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.374 in 1,613,514 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 116,249 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.33 ( 8727 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.38 ( 107522 hom. )

Consequence

VRK1
NM_003384.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.762

Publications

20 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
VRK1 (HGNC:12718): (VRK serine/threonine kinase 1) This gene encodes a member of the vaccinia-related kinase (VRK) family of serine/threonine protein kinases. This gene is widely expressed in human tissues and has increased expression in actively dividing cells, such as those in testis, thymus, fetal liver, and carcinomas. Its protein localizes to the nucleus and has been shown to promote the stability and nuclear accumulation of a transcriptionally active p53 molecule and, in vitro, to phosphorylate Thr18 of p53 and reduce p53 ubiquitination. This gene, therefore, may regulate cell proliferation. This protein also phosphorylates histone, casein, and the transcription factors ATF2 (activating transcription factor 2) and c-JUN. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
VRK1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 1A
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
  • microcephaly-complex motor and sensory axonal neuropathy syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).
BP6
Variant 14-96833516-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-96833516-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 130731.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.762 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.415 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
VRK1NM_003384.3 linkc.45A>G p.Ala15Ala synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 13 ENST00000216639.8 NP_003375.1 Q99986

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
VRK1ENST00000216639.8 linkc.45A>G p.Ala15Ala synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 13 1 NM_003384.3 ENSP00000216639.3 Q99986

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.327
AC:
49639
AN:
152006
Hom.:
8729
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.216
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.303
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.336
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.319
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.111
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.429
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.400
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.326
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.390
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.326
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.356
AC:
89305
AN:
251022
AF XY:
0.366
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.214
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.362
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.315
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.112
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.397
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.390
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.371
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.378
AC:
553130
AN:
1461390
Hom.:
107522
Cov.:
51
AF XY:
0.381
AC XY:
276643
AN XY:
727000
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.207
AC:
6920
AN:
33448
American (AMR)
AF:
0.354
AC:
15834
AN:
44702
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.309
AC:
8081
AN:
26114
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.105
AC:
4175
AN:
39674
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.428
AC:
36918
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.391
AC:
20861
AN:
53374
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.328
AC:
1889
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.393
AC:
436686
AN:
1111696
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.361
AC:
21766
AN:
60366
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
19421
38841
58262
77682
97103
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
13482
26964
40446
53928
67410
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.326
AC:
49657
AN:
152124
Hom.:
8727
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.331
AC XY:
24636
AN XY:
74358
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.216
AC:
8988
AN:
41530
American (AMR)
AF:
0.336
AC:
5129
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.319
AC:
1107
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.111
AC:
573
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.430
AC:
2076
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.400
AC:
4229
AN:
10564
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.310
AC:
91
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.390
AC:
26510
AN:
67968
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.321
AC:
678
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1666
3332
4998
6664
8330
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
510
1020
1530
2040
2550
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.368
Hom.:
15220
Bravo
AF:
0.315
Asia WGS
AF:
0.256
AC:
889
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.386
EpiControl
AF:
0.383

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 1A Benign:4
Nov 19, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Isolated microphthalmia 2 Benign:1
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.75
CADD
Benign
4.7
DANN
Benign
0.46
PhyloP100
-0.76
PromoterAI
0.041
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2145635; hg19: chr14-97299853; COSMIC: COSV53709280; API