15-101018357-G-T
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_024652.6(LRRK1):c.1610-2696G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.678 in 152,048 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 37,305 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.68 ( 37305 hom., cov: 32)
Consequence
LRRK1
NM_024652.6 intron
NM_024652.6 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.147
Publications
23 publications found
Genes affected
LRRK1 (HGNC:18608): (leucine rich repeat kinase 1) This gene encodes a multi-domain protein that is a leucine-rich repeat kinase and a GDP/GTP binding protein. The encoded protein is thought to play a role in the regulation of bone mass. Mice lacking a similar gene showed severe osteopetrosis, increased bone mineralization and decreased bone resorption. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.828 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRRK1 | NM_024652.6 | c.1610-2696G>T | intron_variant | Intron 12 of 33 | ENST00000388948.8 | NP_078928.3 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRRK1 | ENST00000388948.8 | c.1610-2696G>T | intron_variant | Intron 12 of 33 | 5 | NM_024652.6 | ENSP00000373600.3 | |||
| LRRK1 | ENST00000525284.5 | n.1610-2696G>T | intron_variant | Intron 11 of 32 | 1 | ENSP00000433069.1 | ||||
| LRRK1 | ENST00000531270.5 | n.1610-2696G>T | intron_variant | Intron 11 of 31 | 1 | ENSP00000431668.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.678 AC: 103039AN: 151930Hom.: 37296 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
103039
AN:
151930
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.678 AC: 103079AN: 152048Hom.: 37305 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.689 AC XY: 51175AN XY: 74326 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
103079
AN:
152048
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
51175
AN XY:
74326
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
16473
AN:
41400
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
11940
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
2857
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
4108
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
4098
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
8672
AN:
10588
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
238
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
52412
AN:
68002
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
1476
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1488
2976
4465
5953
7441
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
798
1596
2394
3192
3990
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2526
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.