15-23644022-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_019066.5(MAGEL2):c.3721G>A(p.Gly1241Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000579 in 1,607,292 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/15 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_019066.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGEL2 | NM_019066.5 | c.3721G>A | p.Gly1241Ser | missense_variant | 1/1 | ENST00000650528.1 | NP_061939.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGEL2 | ENST00000650528.1 | c.3721G>A | p.Gly1241Ser | missense_variant | 1/1 | NM_019066.5 | ENSP00000497810 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000155 AC: 38AN: 244950Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000188 AC XY: 25AN XY: 132730
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000488 AC: 71AN: 1455006Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000484 AC XY: 35AN XY: 722710
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000144 AC: 22AN: 152286Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000188 AC XY: 14AN XY: 74460
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 05, 2020 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 24, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at