15-34794648-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_005159.5(ACTC1):c.129+32C>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00212 in 1,604,810 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 70 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005159.5 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTC1 | NM_005159.5 | c.129+32C>A | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 6 | ENST00000290378.6 | NP_005150.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTC1 | ENST00000290378.6 | c.129+32C>A | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 6 | 1 | NM_005159.5 | ENSP00000290378.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0107 AC: 1630AN: 151830Hom.: 39 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00274 AC: 642AN: 234502 AF XY: 0.00217 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00122 AC: 1771AN: 1452866Hom.: 31 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00109 AC XY: 786AN XY: 721722 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0107 AC: 1631AN: 151944Hom.: 39 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0106 AC XY: 787AN XY: 74308 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
not provided Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at