15-38253034-C-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_152594.3(SPRED1):​c.-152C>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000024 in 708,592 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SPRED1
NM_152594.3 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.05

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SPRED1 (HGNC:20249): (sprouty related EVH1 domain containing 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the Sprouty family of proteins and is phosphorylated by tyrosine kinase in response to several growth factors. The encoded protein can act as a homodimer or as a heterodimer with SPRED2 to regulate activation of the MAP kinase cascade. Defects in this gene are a cause of neurofibromatosis type 1-like syndrome (NFLS). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
SPRED1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Legius syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000527 (8/151818) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.000458 (7/15284). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000215. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 6 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 8 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SPRED1NM_152594.3 linkc.-152C>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 7 ENST00000299084.9 NP_689807.1 Q7Z699
SPRED1XM_005254202.4 linkc.-152C>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 8 XP_005254259.1
SPRED1XM_047432199.1 linkc.-315C>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 9 XP_047288155.1
SPRED1XM_047432200.1 linkc.-279C>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 8 XP_047288156.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SPRED1ENST00000299084.9 linkc.-152C>A 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 7 1 NM_152594.3 ENSP00000299084.4 Q7Z699
SPRED1ENST00000561205.1 linkn.187C>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 5 5
ENSG00000310144ENST00000847565.1 linkn.95+533G>T intron_variant Intron 1 of 1
SPRED1ENST00000561317.1 linkc.-279C>A upstream_gene_variant 4 ENSP00000453680.1 H0YMN8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000527
AC:
8
AN:
151698
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000162
AC:
9
AN:
556774
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
6
AF XY:
0.0000168
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
298314
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15574
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000907
AC:
3
AN:
33092
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
18852
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
31744
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
60788
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33958
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000415
AC:
1
AN:
2408
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000909
AC:
3
AN:
330162
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000662
AC:
2
AN:
30196
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.514
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000527
AC:
8
AN:
151818
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000809
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74166
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41414
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000458
AC:
7
AN:
15284
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5062
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4810
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10600
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
288
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
67874
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000166

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Legius syndrome Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.57
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Benign
0.90
PhyloP100
2.0
PromoterAI
-0.0094
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs886051102; hg19: chr15-38545235; API