15-38351373-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_152594.3(SPRED1):​c.1044T>C​(p.Val348Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.882 in 1,613,954 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 630,003 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.82 ( 52379 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.89 ( 577624 hom. )

Consequence

SPRED1
NM_152594.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.23

Publications

23 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SPRED1 (HGNC:20249): (sprouty related EVH1 domain containing 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the Sprouty family of proteins and is phosphorylated by tyrosine kinase in response to several growth factors. The encoded protein can act as a homodimer or as a heterodimer with SPRED2 to regulate activation of the MAP kinase cascade. Defects in this gene are a cause of neurofibromatosis type 1-like syndrome (NFLS). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
SPRED1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Legius syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 15-38351373-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-38351373-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 41370.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.23 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.891 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SPRED1NM_152594.3 linkc.1044T>C p.Val348Val synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 7 ENST00000299084.9 NP_689807.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SPRED1ENST00000299084.9 linkc.1044T>C p.Val348Val synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 7 1 NM_152594.3 ENSP00000299084.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.824
AC:
125195
AN:
151996
Hom.:
52366
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.662
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.747
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.841
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.901
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.792
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.877
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.934
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.831
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.896
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.829
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.865
AC:
217398
AN:
251258
AF XY:
0.873
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.652
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.826
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.908
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.789
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.934
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.896
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.871
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.888
AC:
1297707
AN:
1461840
Hom.:
577624
Cov.:
72
AF XY:
0.889
AC XY:
646314
AN XY:
727228
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.645
AC:
21594
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.832
AC:
37207
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.907
AC:
23694
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.784
AC:
31110
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.892
AC:
76946
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.933
AC:
49825
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.841
AC:
4849
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.899
AC:
999655
AN:
1111982
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.875
AC:
52827
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
9862
19723
29585
39446
49308
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
21408
42816
64224
85632
107040
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.823
AC:
125259
AN:
152114
Hom.:
52379
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.825
AC XY:
61366
AN XY:
74352
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.662
AC:
27425
AN:
41448
American (AMR)
AF:
0.842
AC:
12852
AN:
15272
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.901
AC:
3126
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.792
AC:
4101
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.877
AC:
4218
AN:
4808
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.934
AC:
9903
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.829
AC:
242
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.896
AC:
60978
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.822
AC:
1734
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1065
2131
3196
4262
5327
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
878
1756
2634
3512
4390
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.871
Hom.:
125879
Bravo
AF:
0.805
Asia WGS
AF:
0.795
AC:
2767
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.890
EpiControl
AF:
0.886

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Dec 30, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 14, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 14, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Val348Val in exon 7 of SPRED1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and it has been identified in 90% (6302/7020) of European American chromosomes and 69% (2574/3738) of African American chromosom es from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs. washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs3751526).

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Legius syndrome Benign:6Other:1
GeneReviews
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 25, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:2
Apr 18, 2017
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The SPRED1 c.1044T>C (p.Val348Val) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. Mutation taster predicts a polymorphism outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may affect binding of multiple ESE sites. However, no published functional studies are available to confirm these predictions. This variant was found in 104813/121358 control chromosomes (45668 homozygotes) from ExAC at a frequency of 0.8636678; therefore it is a very common polymorphism and allele C is the major allele at this cDNA position. Several clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases have classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign.

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Apr 04, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
8.7
DANN
Benign
0.77
PhyloP100
1.2
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3751526; hg19: chr15-38643574; COSMIC: COSV54434386; API