15-45153958-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_175940.3(DUOX1):c.3532C>T(p.Leu1178Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.653 in 1,608,952 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 348,393 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_175940.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUOX1 | NM_175940.3 | c.3532C>T | p.Leu1178Phe | missense_variant | 27/34 | ENST00000389037.7 | NP_787954.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUOX1 | ENST00000389037.7 | c.3532C>T | p.Leu1178Phe | missense_variant | 27/34 | 1 | NM_175940.3 | ENSP00000373689.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.586 AC: 88706AN: 151438Hom.: 27054 Cov.: 29
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.619 AC: 155532AN: 251390Hom.: 49469 AF XY: 0.632 AC XY: 85935AN XY: 135878
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.660 AC: 962361AN: 1457398Hom.: 321343 Cov.: 40 AF XY: 0.662 AC XY: 480428AN XY: 725294
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.585 AC: 88725AN: 151554Hom.: 27050 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.589 AC XY: 43574AN XY: 73992
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 22, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at