15-51083632-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001311175.2(TNFAIP8L3):c.52+10912A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.807 in 152,220 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 49,931 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001311175.2 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001311175.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNFAIP8L3 | NM_001311175.2 | MANE Select | c.52+10912A>G | intron | N/A | NP_001298104.1 | |||
| TNFAIP8L3 | NM_207381.4 | c.316+10912A>G | intron | N/A | NP_997264.2 | ||||
| MIR4713HG | NR_146310.1 | n.194+45951T>C | intron | N/A |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNFAIP8L3 | ENST00000637513.2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.52+10912A>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000489743.1 | |||
| TNFAIP8L3 | ENST00000327536.5 | TSL:1 | c.316+10912A>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000328016.5 | |||
| TNFAIP8L3 | ENST00000649177.1 | c.-87+10779A>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000498365.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.807 AC: 122717AN: 152100Hom.: 49875 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.807 AC: 122830AN: 152220Hom.: 49931 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.807 AC XY: 60085AN XY: 74438 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at