15-63059560-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001018005.2(TPM1):c.375-3C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000773 in 1,606,512 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00043 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00081 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

TPM1
NM_001018005.2 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.03336

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.40

Variant links:

Genes affected

TPM1 (HGNC:12010): (tropomyosin 1) This gene is a member of the tropomyosin family of highly conserved, widely distributed actin-binding proteins involved in the contractile system of striated and smooth muscles and the cytoskeleton of non-muscle cells. Tropomyosin is composed of two alpha-helical chains arranged as a coiled-coil. It is polymerized end to end along the two grooves of actin filaments and provides stability to the filaments. The encoded protein is one type of alpha helical chain that forms the predominant tropomyosin of striated muscle, where it also functions in association with the troponin complex to regulate the calcium-dependent interaction of actin and myosin during muscle contraction. In smooth muscle and non-muscle cells, alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding a range of isoforms have been described. Mutations in this gene are associated with type 3 familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy 1Y. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]

TPM1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.44).

BP6

Variant 15-63059560-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-63059560-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 178146.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=6, Likely_benign=2}. Variant chr15-63059560-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000434 (66/152242) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0118 (57/4820). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00937. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 45 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 66 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TPM1	NM_001018005.2 link	c.375-3C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 3 of 9	ENST00000403994.9	NP_001018005.1	P09493-1D9YZV4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TPM1	ENST00000403994.9 link	c.375-3C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 3 of 9	1	NM_001018005.2	ENSP00000385107.4		P09493-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000434

AC:

AN:

152124

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0118

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00143

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00160

AC:

402

AN:

251422

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00227

AC XY:

309

AN XY:

135890

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0125

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000809

AC:

1176

AN:

1454270

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00110

AC XY:

795

AN XY:

723662

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000120

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0119

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000949

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000768

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000434

AC:

AN:

152242

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000605

AC XY:

AN XY:

74430

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0118

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.0000755

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000128

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00635

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:6

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	Aug 26, 2014	c.375-3C>T in intron 3 of TPM1: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not cause the splice site sequence to diverge from co nsensus. It has been identified in 2/8600 of European American chromosomes by th e NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs202 228866). -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Blueprint Genetics	Nov 10, 2015	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Mar 17, 2015	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Aug 19, 2023	- -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Jun 18, 2018	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario	Nov 30, 2017	- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 3

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Feb 01, 2019

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1Y

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Feb 01, 2019

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 29, 2025

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

May 30, 2017

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.44

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.68

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.033

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.21

SpliceAI score (max)

0.20

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

DS_AG_spliceai

0.20

Position offset: 5

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over