15-64162961-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PP5_Moderate
The NM_000942.5(PPIB):c.26T>A(p.Met9Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,459,000 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000942.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000806 AC: 2AN: 248020Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000742 AC XY: 1AN XY: 134790
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1459000Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 725876
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Osteogenesis imperfecta Pathogenic:1
Variant summary: PPIB c.26T>A (p.Met9Lys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8.1e-06 in 248020 control chromosomes. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.26T>A in individuals affected with Osteogenesis Imperfecta and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. No submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. However, multiple lines of evidence suggest that the p.Met9 codon, and not the p.Met1 codon, may be the true initiator codon (curated Uniprot assertion P23284, conservation across Animal kingdom alignments, match to Kozak consensus sequence, total loss of detectable protein in an individual with a different missense at this codon p.Met9Arg, and a pathogenic variant at this codon p.Met9Val; PMID: 20089953, 28116328). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely pathogenic. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at