15-68214305-G-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_017882.3(CLN6):c.282C>A(p.Pro94Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000113 in 1,613,556 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00010 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CLN6
NM_017882.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.495

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CLN6 (HGNC:2077): (CLN6 transmembrane ER protein) This gene is one of eight which have been associated with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCL). Also referred to as Batten disease, NCL comprises a class of autosomal recessive, neurodegenerative disorders affecting children. The genes responsible likely encode proteins involved in the degradation of post-translationally modified proteins in lysosomes. The primary defect in NCL disorders is thought to be associated with lysosomal storage function. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

CLN6 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

ceroid lipofuscinosis, neuronal, 6A
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Myriad Women’s Health, Orphanet
ceroid lipofuscinosis, neuronal, 6B (Kufs type)
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Orphanet
neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen

CLN6 links:

ENSG00000260007 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000260007 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.020851523).

BP6

Variant 15-68214305-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-68214305-G-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 136796.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.495 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CLN6	NM_017882.3 link	c.282C>A	p.Pro94Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 7	ENST00000249806.11	NP_060352.1
CLN6	NM_001411068.1 link	c.378C>A	p.Pro126Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 7		NP_001397997.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CLN6	ENST00000249806.11 link	c.282C>A	p.Pro94Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 7	1	NM_017882.3	ENSP00000249806.5
ENSG00000260007	ENST00000562767.2 link	c.83+15197C>A		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 2	3		ENSP00000456336.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000217

AC:

AN:

152258

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000482

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00183

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000290

AC:

AN:

251478

AF XY:

0.000228

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00176

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000703

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000102

AC:

149

AN:

1461180

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000103

AC XY:

AN XY:

726950

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33466

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00192

AC:

AN:

44718

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39692

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86238

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53396

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000450

AC:

AN:

1111408

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000215

AC:

AN:

60366

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.473

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000217

AC:

AN:

152376

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000295

AC XY:

AN XY:

74512

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000481

AC:

AN:

41592

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00183

AC:

AN:

15308

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10630

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68038

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.501

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000168

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000385

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000239

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

Jan 15, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified

Benign:2

Oct 30, 2013

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Jul 05, 2024

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

May 25, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.23

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.63

CADD

Benign

8.7

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

Eigen

Benign

-0.44

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.36

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.48

LIST_S2

Benign

0.28

M_CAP

Benign

0.0094

MetaRNN

Benign

0.021

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.27

PhyloP100

-0.49

GERP RS

0.43

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over