15-72350574-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_Strong
The NM_000520.6(HEXA):c.749G>T(p.Gly250Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,834 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G250D) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000520.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEXA | NM_000520.6 | c.749G>T | p.Gly250Val | missense_variant | 7/14 | ENST00000268097.10 | NP_000511.2 | |
HEXA | NM_001318825.2 | c.782G>T | p.Gly261Val | missense_variant | 7/14 | NP_001305754.1 | ||
HEXA | NR_134869.3 | n.791G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 7/11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEXA | ENST00000268097.10 | c.749G>T | p.Gly250Val | missense_variant | 7/14 | 1 | NM_000520.6 | ENSP00000268097 | P1 | |
ENST00000570175.1 | n.1928C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/3 | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000795 AC: 2AN: 251484Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135916
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461834Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727218
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tay-Sachs disease Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Mar 20, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at