Menu
GeneBe

15-73323537-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_005477.3(HCN4):​c.2556G>A​(p.Pro852=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0453 in 1,601,002 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,989 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P852P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.037 ( 150 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.046 ( 1839 hom. )

Consequence

HCN4
NM_005477.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.21
Variant links:
Genes affected
HCN4 (HGNC:16882): (hyperpolarization activated cyclic nucleotide gated potassium channel 4) This gene encodes a member of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated potassium channels. The encoded protein shows slow kinetics of activation and inactivation, and is necessary for the cardiac pacemaking process. This channel may also mediate responses to sour stimuli. Mutations in this gene have been linked to sick sinus syndrome 2, also known as atrial fibrillation with bradyarrhythmia or familial sinus bradycardia. Two pseudogenes have been identified on chromosome 15. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 15-73323537-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-73323537-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 95284.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-73323537-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.2 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0726 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
HCN4NM_005477.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2556G>A p.Pro852= synonymous_variant 8/8 ENST00000261917.4
HCN4XM_011521148.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1338G>A p.Pro446= synonymous_variant 7/7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
HCN4ENST00000261917.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2556G>A p.Pro852= synonymous_variant 8/81 NM_005477.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0371
AC:
5651
AN:
152160
Hom.:
148
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00658
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0758
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0193
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000772
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0465
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0194
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0501
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0493
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0489
AC:
11512
AN:
235532
Hom.:
395
AF XY:
0.0476
AC XY:
6113
AN XY:
128470
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.108
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0225
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000110
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0457
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0215
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0501
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0536
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0461
AC:
66785
AN:
1448724
Hom.:
1839
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.0460
AC XY:
33153
AN XY:
721108
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00839
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.105
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0220
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0471
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0236
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0481
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0421
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0372
AC:
5661
AN:
152278
Hom.:
150
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0366
AC XY:
2727
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0763
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0193
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000773
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0468
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0194
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0501
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0488
Alfa
AF:
0.0221
Hom.:
13
Bravo
AF:
0.0402
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0180
AC:
64
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0518
EpiControl
AF:
0.0529

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 04, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 16, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 05, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Sick sinus syndrome 2, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Brugada syndrome 8 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 19, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.73
CADD
Benign
1.4
DANN
Benign
0.60

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs117819825; hg19: chr15-73615878; COSMIC: COSV56082975; API