15-73329605-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000261917.4(HCN4):c.1558C>T(p.Leu520=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0922 in 1,614,036 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7,360 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L520L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000261917.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCN4 | NM_005477.3 | c.1558C>T | p.Leu520= | synonymous_variant | 4/8 | ENST00000261917.4 | NP_005468.1 | |
HCN4 | XM_011521148.3 | c.340C>T | p.Leu114= | synonymous_variant | 3/7 | XP_011519450.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCN4 | ENST00000261917.4 | c.1558C>T | p.Leu520= | synonymous_variant | 4/8 | 1 | NM_005477.3 | ENSP00000261917 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0779 AC: 11851AN: 152160Hom.: 554 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0868 AC: 21817AN: 251428Hom.: 1094 AF XY: 0.0890 AC XY: 12090AN XY: 135902
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0937 AC: 136926AN: 1461758Hom.: 6808 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0942 AC XY: 68517AN XY: 727198
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0778 AC: 11849AN: 152278Hom.: 552 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0792 AC XY: 5899AN XY: 74468
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 22, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 10, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 04, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Sick sinus syndrome 2, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 15, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Brugada syndrome 8 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 23, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at