15-74830171-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001030005.3(CPLX3):c.294C>A(p.Asp98Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000223 in 1,613,708 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D98N) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001030005.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001030005.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPLX3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.294C>A | p.Asp98Glu | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000378464.4 | Q8WVH0 | ||
| ENSG00000261606 | TSL:2 | n.3503C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 14 of 14 | |||||
| ENSG00000261606 | TSL:2 | n.3732C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 6 of 6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152010Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251180 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000821 AC: 12AN: 1461698Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727134 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152010Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000202 AC XY: 15AN XY: 74226 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at